Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Barrel/handguard/FH combo question.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)

    Barrel/handguard/FH combo question.

    I don't have all the parts yet and wanted to ask before I buy.

    I want to build a 300BLK upper for a pistol. I have a Noveske Gen I upper receiver. I would like to build this out using a 8.5" Noveske 300BLK barrel with low pro gas block and a Knights Armament 8" URX 3.1 handguard. I would like to use a Surefire Warcomp as my flash hider and suppressor attachment. Will this combo give me enough room to attach a Surefire SOCOM 762 or would I need a longer barrel? I figure the barrel gives me .500 inch but will be used to attach Warcomp. and not sure how much room is needed to attach SOCOM?


    Any thoughts?

    Links:

    Noveske Barrel:
    https://www.noveske.com/products/300...lackout-barrel

    KAC URX 3.1:
    http://shop.knightarmco.com/ProductD...ductID=KM30210

    Surefire Warcomp:
    https://www.surefire.com/tactical-eq...62-5-8-24.html

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    1,666
    Feedback Score
    0
    8" URX 3.1 needs a 9" barrel (could squeak by with an 8.75"). The old AAC uppers utilizing the 8" URX 3.1s used 9" barrels.

    Also, the SOCOM762s are considered to be poor performers when paired with .300 BLK.
    Last edited by Defaultmp3; 06-06-18 at 00:16.
    Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

    老僧三十年前未參禪時、見山是山、見水是水、及至後夾親見知識、有箇入處、見山不是山、見水不是水、而今得箇體歇處、依然見山秪是山、見水秪是水。

    https://www.instagram.com/defaultmp3/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Defaultmp3 View Post
    8" URX 3.1 needs a 9" barrel (could squeak by with an 8.75"). The old AAC uppers utilizing the 8" URX 3.1s used 9" barrels.

    Also, the SOCOM762s are considered to be poor performers when pared with .300 BLK.
    Thanks for the info. Why are the 762;s considered to be poor performers? I bought mine like a month before Surefire release a dedicated 300BLK suppressor.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    N.E. OH
    Posts
    7,607
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by elephant View Post
    Thanks for the info. Why are the 762;s considered to be poor performers? I bought mine like a month before Surefire release a dedicated 300BLK suppressor.
    From what ive read, its one of the loudest 762 cans when on a 300blk.
    Iirc the baffle design was optimized for high pressure 308 and just doesnt supress well on a 300blk.
    Im not sure if its as “bad” on supers as subs.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,710
    Feedback Score
    204 (100%)
    You need .67 to clear the SOCOM. And that's stretching it.

    The SOCOM 7.62 RC was designed for 300 wm. So pretty much it sucks on 300blk. The SPS300 is much, much better.
    Philippians 4:13

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    1,571
    Feedback Score
    12 (93%)
    lets move on:

    Noveske 11.5 barrel
    KAC 10.75" rail
    AAC 51T flash hider

    would this combo work giving me only .75 inches of barrel out the rail?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •