Originally Posted by
Kchen986
Carried a PM9 with safety as my pocket pistol for a couple of years, as I'm usually in a suit. Ended up going with a Glock 43. The PM9 is difficult to shoot well, especially with the tiny grip--almost akin to shooting .38 snub noses with full power loads. The trigger also changes based on the # of rounds you have in the magazine--the initial round is light but the last round will be significantly heavier due to the magazine's pressure against the slide. Never had a malfunction with mine, but I know some PM9s had case-hardening issues with the barrel.
Would I recommend it? Not anymore. Try the Glock 43 and the PM9 before you decide.
My experience exactly.
EDIT: My PM9094NA required a 500 round break-in period before I trusted it to run. YMMV
Last edited by SiGfever; 07-04-18 at 12:01.
Reason: Added information
"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."
- George Washington
"Some of you would bitch if a hot blonde served you a perfect steak and beer of choice while naked and performed acts not described." Mark5pt56
Bookmarks