Interested in hearing from people who are using Q suppressors. Good, Bad, Ugly, Great, Ok ?
Interested in hearing from people who are using Q suppressors. Good, Bad, Ugly, Great, Ok ?
John
aka LONGSHOT2000
Disclosure:
Part-Owner of Charlies Custom Clones
Avid firearms enthusiast and 2A Constitutionalist
and agitator of the left and the FAKE NEWS
Scope Slut and Barrel Nerd
youtube
John
aka LONGSHOT2000
Disclosure:
Part-Owner of Charlies Custom Clones
Avid firearms enthusiast and 2A Constitutionalist
and agitator of the left and the FAKE NEWS
Scope Slut and Barrel Nerd
youtube
From what I understand Kevin's cans are the next evolution of what he did for sig's lines of cans. Lighter, more volume, better tapered muzzle devices for his "QD" cans ect... However, I haven't seen any metering data on any of them and as of now hes only putting out 30 cal cans and 22 cans. I have heard dedicated 556 cans are coming down the line. If there was more info available on metering data, back pressure ect... I would have probably bought one at this point to try out.
Agreed here. Lack of independent test data is holding me back.
But that is also what I hear based on what they've publicly spoken about.
PS: there is a podcast interview series with him on iTunes. I don't use iTunes, so I haven't heard it yet.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Very unlikely they will suck. They will be as good as his last work, but only time will tell. The concern is will he or it be around. On a bolt gun, cans just work for the most part. Ive been happy with every can I have run on bolts. Gas guns and back pressure is where the rubber meets the road IMHO. --And QD devices.
PB
"Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"
And, he has a couple of guns as well. From what I hear they are selling well, but low production.
John
aka LONGSHOT2000
Disclosure:
Part-Owner of Charlies Custom Clones
Avid firearms enthusiast and 2A Constitutionalist
and agitator of the left and the FAKE NEWS
Scope Slut and Barrel Nerd
youtube
I remember back in the day when independent testing was a thing... it was highly overrated. I paid for titsworth’s service to test cans and it was pretty worthless. After spending a lot of money for the service and owning 10+ cans (AAC, Silencerco, Surefire, KAC, Q on the way), I have come to the conclusion that decibel rating isn’t all that important when compared to other factors.
That said, if you really want the testing, modern rifleman has a pretty massive database of data that includes Q’s cans.
https://modernrifleman.net/suppressors/
Last edited by GlocksInMySocks; 07-11-18 at 09:02.
You say "I have come to the conclusion that decibel rating isn’t all that important" well you could not be more wrong. Spend $1000 on a 15-20 dB can and you will understand how important it is. Before Joe Sixpack had a meter, MFGs were putting out a lot of crap and making a lot of BS claims. Lots of 40+ dB reduction claims on cans getting 20 dB reduction. As a result MFGs got better (You can thank the independent testers of yester-year for that) and most cans are similar nowadays, except for the occasional slug. The most recent fiasco was the Sig 22 can. I think SS metered it at 125 dB. POS. The public shaming resulted in them pulling it from the market and redesigning it and releasing a new version (SRD22x).
As for Q, history repeats itself. Some good cans, some slugs, and way too much childish marketing.
Last edited by Renegade; 07-11-18 at 14:02.
Bookmarks