Anyone know anything about this besides the bad pictures? These pictures are at 8x.
Reticle is different and I don't think there is anything wrong with it...?
Thanks.
What I was expecting.
![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Anyone know anything about this besides the bad pictures? These pictures are at 8x.
Reticle is different and I don't think there is anything wrong with it...?
Thanks.
What I was expecting.
![]()
Last edited by Double3; 06-27-18 at 17:34.
Are you talking about the top one? The bottom one looks fine. Just be glad it is daylight bright, the TMRs aren't. The green look with out illumination is from the illumination method used by Leupold. That is normal for the scope.
I just did two lines of powdered wig powder, cranked up some Lee Greenwood, and recited the BoR. - Outlander Systems
I'm a professional WAGer- WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman
Top one might just be a crappy photo, unless it's yours and you can confirm its a solid dot.
Could also be a manufacturing issue - might be worth calling the source - Leupold...
I don't think anyone else has either. Also can't imagine that it was a circle and there is something wrong with it cause the dot is crisp and when it is not illuminated you can see that it is a dot.
The way it was explained to me this is a unicorn out in the wild. I need to contact him again. From what I can tell he should know exactly what he is talking about.
Let me guess - limited run for lizard eaters and door kickers, and now all the period clone nerds are going to be rushing down your door trying to marry off their firstborn for this collector piece.
Bookmarks