Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: 2.5-10 magnification, or close to it. What do you pick?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    488
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    2.5-10 magnification, or close to it. What do you pick?

    I am looking for a scope in that magnification range. It will sit on top of a SCAR 17. I want a little more than 8X magnification. What would you choose. Budget is around $2k max.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    Nightforce NXS 2.5-10x42mm - a little older but an awesome optic right in your budget.

    Last edited by themonk; 06-29-18 at 09:10.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,692
    Feedback Score
    40 (100%)
    If you want to go lighter weight (given the SCARs lightweight) but probably not as durable, leupold makes the VX-6HD 2-12x42 that's only 16oz.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Inland Northwest
    Posts
    1,356
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    NXS 2.5-10x24/32/42. The 42mm model has adjustable parallax if you’re going to be doing more long range precision work.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    698
    Feedback Score
    49 (100%)
    Just FYI on optic quality, I've had high-end 8x's match the capabilities of decent 10x's and sub-par 12x's. So thinking you'll go lower quality but with higher mag won't net you much in the long run. 8x in the right package gets me out to 800m with my spr just fine.

    Regarding Nightforces and the 2.5-10's...
    The x24 is very restricting with poor transmission, but dang if it ain't small
    The x32 not even sure if you can still get these...not much point when you can go x42 and get more
    The x42 is a neat little optic, and runs like a big scope but is under 21 oz. Liked mine a lot, but got more out of a 1-8x FFP.

    I've watched too many Vortex PST's crap out and not track in classes to recommend any Vortex that doesn't have "Razor HD II" in it's name...and even then I'm not a huge fan.

    The problem is this niche' of 30mm tube 20-23oz top end 10-12ishx42mm (or less) optics is lacking for decent tactical style optics. Most companies step up the tube size and objective and you're up to a full-power precision optic that weighs an ounce or so under 2 pounds. I wish they'd try and crack that nut rather than the other boundaries they're constantly pushing

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    I have the NF 2.5-10x24 on my SBR'ed 13" SCAR 17. One of the 'limited release' MOAR models from a couple of years ago.

    It's a great scope as long as you understand what it's strengths are (small size, NF bomb proof construction / tracking) and weaknesses (light transmission, FOV / eyebox at high power).

    For me with the SCARs higher top rail, I see 20-ish oz. as being the heaviest optic I want, or it seems to get a bad case of the leans with the high CG when doing lateral transitions.

    With all that beings said, I'm tempted to move my NF 2.5-10x24 to an 5.56 AR SPR rifle and get a NF 1-8x for the SCAR 17.
    Last edited by RHINOWSO; 06-29-18 at 14:29.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas, Nv
    Posts
    328
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by pointblank4445 View Post
    Just FYI on optic quality, I've had high-end 8x's match the capabilities of decent 10x's and sub-par 12x's. So thinking you'll go lower quality but with higher mag won't net you much in the long run. 8x in the right package gets me out to 800m with my spr just fine.

    Regarding Nightforces and the 2.5-10's...
    The x24 is very restricting with poor transmission, but dang if it ain't small
    The x32 not even sure if you can still get these...not much point when you can go x42 and get more
    The x42 is a neat little optic, and runs like a big scope but is under 21 oz. Liked mine a lot, but got more out of a 1-8x FFP.

    I've watched too many Vortex PST's crap out and not track in classes to recommend any Vortex that doesn't have "Razor HD II" in it's name...and even then I'm not a huge fan.

    The problem is this niche' of 30mm tube 20-23oz top end 10-12ishx42mm (or less) optics is lacking for decent tactical style optics. Most companies step up the tube size and objective and you're up to a full-power precision optic that weighs an ounce or so under 2 pounds. I wish they'd try and crack that nut rather than the other boundaries they're constantly pushing
    There is SO much yes in this post! You literally wrote my exact thoughts on the matter here.
    I completely agree with the take on fantastic 1-8’s that outdo mid tier 10X’s. It’s been said before, but quality in glass far outdoes quantity of X’s. I would walk over a handful of Vortex Viper 2.5-10’s to get my ATACR 1-8, and, I’ve had two of the Vortex 2.5-10’s. One FFP and one SFP. I think the NF 2.5-10 is sorta dated now, but for its size, weight, and role, it’s still hard to beat I think.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    965
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    My honest feeling is, unless you really really need more than 4x, it is very hard to beat an acog. The size and weight are hard to ignore.

    But I guess that is a different discussion

    Sent from my SM-S327VL using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    618
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Kevin B at Q went on an on about the new Eotech Vudu 5-25 last week on instagram. They have a 2.5-10 as well.
    "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system, but too early to shoot the bastards."- Claire Wolfe

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •