Originally Posted by
Averageman
After listening to that and then looking at current events, it makes you wonder.
Britain is taking a beating lately, from the tone of the article in the OP, it would seem these two were known to use hard drugs.
Using Russia as a scare tactic to divert some attention might be useful to them.
I think that your wonder and my wonder would be different.
Yes, the MSM does fake news, but it is usually around the tone and the 'why'- the shape the facts to their narrative.
Tying these poisonings to Syrian Chemical weapons- and bringing in the Israeli bogey man?
TG: And have Russia’s chemical weapons been destroyed?
MS: Yes, of course, but ours haven’t. Porton Down hasn’t been dismantled, has it?
TG: And neither has that of the United States. The program of destruction of US chemical weapons has still five years to run.
Sure, that is why it can't be the Russians....
The whole logical argument that it can't be the Russians because there are other ways to kill people more quietly and everyone knows Putin is bad is really weak. If Putin's enemies didn't die, or didn't die in ways linked to Putin- why fear him? Are we really doing anything because he poisoned people?
Is this guy a 9/11 Truther too?
I really have better things to do than listen to or read an 90 minute transcript over my vacation. Anyone got the cliff's notes on this one?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks