Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: Colt 1991 Gauntlet Test Results

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    482
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Colt 1991 Gauntlet Test Results

    Wanted to post this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=09CTiHsshhg

    I care less about MAC and his silly test and am hoping to get some thoughts on what happened to this Colt. TLDR; gun has consistent FTRTB issues with and without a magazine. The position the slide fails at appears to be near the disconnector/S80 drop safety. I am thinking gunk got in those parts causing the slide to hang up? Does not appear to be a mag issue as suspected by MAC and YT commentators.

    Initially I thought something was keeping the slide stop pressed up, but after he rinsed the gun and issues still occurred, it seems like the S80 parts may be the culprit. Hoping to get professional and hobbyists' thoughts.

    This test doesn't dissuade me from my choice in the 1911 platform, but has me thinking the S80 may not be very suitable for filthy conditions. I actually do believe the 1911 in a S70 format with modern features would have performed much better.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Probably sand that went down the face of the hammer and clogged up the disconnector.

    The Series 80 stuff is good to go and I like it for a carry gun.

    That dipshit didn’t understand that the follower jumped the slide stop when it didn’t lock open the first time.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    https://www.m4carbine.net/faq.php?fa...q_new_faq_item
    1) Derogatory Remarks – Please do not post any comments that are intentional personal attacks against other members. (Including, but not limited to, name calling, comments of a racial, religious or sexual nature.) Debate is welcome and encouraged. Personal attacks, and name calling, serve no purpose in the exchange and debate of good information. Please be respectful to your fellow shooting enthusiasts whether they are new shooters or seasoned veterans.
    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...67#post1652467
    If you call another member a name in a manner that is in any way interpreted as hostile or sarcastic (because sarcasm is a huge accelerant -- if not the most volatile of them all), your balls will be summarily-crushed.
    https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread...313#post857313
    Personal Attacks.
    The Good: Like pretty much every board on the internet, we have a policy against personal attacks, and we strongly believe that it is possible -- even essential -- to be able to disagree with another's position without crossing the line and insulting them in the process.
    The Bad: Our tolerance level for "in your face" posting activity is very, very low. If you go after another member, you can expect to be dealt with swiftly and severely ... even if we happen to agree with your side of the debate. The issue here isn't who is right and who is wrong, but rather, how we have resolved to deal with each other while advancing our various views.
    The Ugly: It is admittedly difficult for the staff to apply a uniform standard in these cases, and it may seem that someone else got away with worse, when you got hammered for a lesser offense. A thinking man would endeavor to steer clear of trouble altogether, but if you are ever singled-out for correction, just take your licks and move on. This isn't about you; it's about the health of the forum.
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Is MAC a member here?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,799
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    He is a well known member of the shooting community who stands up for our rights. It's one thing to discuss points of disagreement, but resorting name calling is bad form.
    The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday

    http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n289/SgtSongDog/AR%20Carbine/DSC_0114.jpg
    I am American

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Midwest Flyover Country
    Posts
    3,742
    Feedback Score
    0
    If you are not looking to get your Jimmies rustled, don't watch this video.

    Before there was Glock, there was the indestructible Makarov- shocking torture test results.


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,434
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MistWolf View Post
    He is a well known member of the shooting community who stands up for our rights. It's one thing to discuss points of disagreement, but resorting name calling is bad form.
    Well known for what? Looks like he just plays in the mud to me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,422
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    If you consider the design, it is only logical that the 1911 design would have these issues.
    Just too many places for debris to accumulate, bind and stop the gun from performing.
    The 1911 is a work of art, however the design is well over a century old. Is it any wonder that 100 years later newer designs have improved performance?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,189
    Feedback Score
    0
    Note to self: remove handgun before next mud wrestling session. On one video he joked about doing an indoor carpet lint gauntlet. I appreciate his videos. If you don't like them, don't watch them.
    “It's no wonder that truth is stranger than fiction. Fiction has to make sense.” Mark Twain

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    103
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    The issues with the 1911 as others have said are pretty common. The design has a lot of opening for junk to get in and may be one of the reasons the military’s of the worlds are big on striker fired pistols?

    Might be why they issued 1911’s in flap holsters?

    Doesn’t make it a bad design but everything has limitations I guess.

    Ed
    Last edited by ejr490; 08-01-18 at 21:47. Reason: Spelling

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •