Originally Posted by
SteyrAUG
Ok, so I watched the video, let's assume the Greenpeace hippy (who ironically was burning fossil fuels but whatever...) had an IED, a machine gun and an mandate to kill Trump. As he glided within 100 yards Trump calmly walked indoors as the security detail assessed the level of threat.
Thankfully they didn't go "guns blazing" because the newspapers the next day would sound like this "Trump Assassination Team Kills Unarmed Peaceful Protestor" because Trump is like a nazi and likes to have people killed because he's a racist and thought the greenpeace guy might be mexican or something.
Instead the flying Green Machine made a pass of no consequence (except for burning fossil fuels) and Trump probably laughed to himself thinking "What a dork" and feeling embarrassed for what Scotland has become.
That is not how you protect POTUS. That is using hindsight to justify your inactions. It is called 'luck'.
The real issue here is that this guy got to the 19th hole. Why he wasn't intercepted miles out is the real issue. A helo should have dumped his shoot. A MANPAD drone should have jacked with him, his motor, or lines. That you had to put those point defense people in that situation is inexplicable.
You fly to with in feet of POTUS, you had better understand your life is forfeit. I don't care what it looks like in the press. How many POTUS have we lost- and once again, what level of security is instituted to protect him and this happens.
OK, let's say that they knew that this guy was inbound so that he isn't a threat to be lit up. So why wasn't he intercepted? Why wasn't POTUS not there? Was USSS/NSA and the British assets unable to cipher out that an this was going to happen? What does that tell you about POTUS and our general safety. How is it we spend trillions on defense and some idiots with a $10k powered parachute get that close? What if this were a 150mph drone?
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Bookmarks