I have found that in the shorter barrels, Colt does better than most, in terms of all around goodness of a barrel. Accuracy, wear, ability to take grit and grime. A number of our mil and LE clients have ditched other barrels in favor of Colt in the 10.3" to 14.4" variety, and some are ditched more than others. Daniel Defense seems to run a close 2nd with Gov't profile barrels, in terms of accuracy, in my experience and in working with operators. As you go out to 16, 18 and 20", you are talking about an entirely different gun, and different barrels, and many others do great, and better than the Colt SBRs.
For Chrome-lined barrels, 1.0 MOA is very good. Like Stick and others have said, it really all depends, and you will see people swear by barrels that give much better or much worse results. Remember, though, that a chrome-lined barrel is not built for accuracy. Its purpose is durability. I know I will get detractors, but it is true. The chrome lining is not there to make the barrel accurate. In fact, accuracy and chrome lining are inversely correlated, all other facts remaining the same. Whether it is buttoned or CHF I don't think matters. Buttoning is generally more accurate, but once you introduce chrome lining, that is the single largest factor that will lead to different results, as getting a straight and consistent lining is very difficult.
John
aka LONGSHOT2000
Disclosure:
Part-Owner of Charlies Custom Clones
Avid firearms enthusiast and 2A Constitutionalist
and agitator of the left and the FAKE NEWS
Scope Slut and Barrel Nerd
youtube
In my experience so far, a solid chrome lined barrel in a legit platform, with match ammo, and a good shooter ought to be hold an MOA, or darn close to it. Wether it be an AR15, a SCAR17S, or an LMT MWS.
Or an FN SPR.
I have found the 14.5" Colt SOCOM barrels love .77gr OTM Mk262's alot. Whether it was by issued one in 10-11 or my current home built one with it.
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
US ARMY, Retired
INFANTRY, SNIPER SCHOOL, MACHINE GUN LEADER'S COURSE, COMPANY MASTER GUNNER, UNIT ARMORER, AIR ASSAULT
OIF DEC 03-FEB 04, SEP 05-SEP 06, SEP 07-NOV 08
OEF FEB 10-FEB 11
Certainly there is no hunting like the hunting of man and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never really care for anything else thereafter. -- Ernest Hemingway
I would have bet heavily on your exact outcome b/t a Colt barrel vs. the comparable BCM barrel. Lots of documented accuracy tests on Colt and BCM barrels, one I almost never read about producing a suspect, or bad performing barrel, the other I read quite often about it's mediocre performance.
I'd expect if you got two of the same Colt barrels, or two of the same BCM barrels and did a more apples to apples evaluation....your results wouldn't suggest that such a universal discrepancy exists from one barrel to the next.
Barrels aren't true snowflakes, but given we understand basic materials & engineering science, we can assume that every barrel can't be exactly identical as the previous one made. Things like tool wear on the drill bits, or reamer are examples of this. Then you could also find subtle differences in lapping and polishing. If the context we're talking about is just comparing one barrel to the next on the same line, from the same mfg., and made one after another, these subtle differences would be microscopic in analysis, and to my knowledge wouldn't lead to the shooter ever noticing a difference on target.
Now in the context of barrel manufacturer to barrel manufacturer, these areas create vast differences b/t two comparable barrels from different manufactures. My Rock 5R SS barrels are built with loving care, and no expense is spared in the pursuit of building a super accurate barrel. Those areas like using only the best machines, constantly changing bits, and spending special attention to the lapping and polishing of the barrel just aren't practicable for the vast majority of barrel manufactures, or what most shooters can take advantage of for that matter. It's almost unheard of to hear a bad report of a Rock 5R cut rifled barrel, and several other high end barrel manufacturers share the same accolade. If a barrel manufacturer couldn't produce a repeatable product over time, these great reputations wouldn't exist. Their price tag reflects all that extra work, and cost, and Nth degree of performance.
My thoughts in summery,
Comparing two barrels from the same make, model, and made date should show very little to no measurable or quantifiable differences in accuracy.
Comparing two barrels from different makers is apples to oranges period. There are way to many variables b/t manufacturers even when they produce the exact same spec'd barrel to make any valid comparison.
Yep, apples and oranges between manufacturers, which is why the basis of my question gravitated towards the materials used and manufacturing process of what would essentially be considered duty-grade or rack barrels, and what separates one rack barrel from another. I think John, the Barrel Nerd at Charlie's, addressed that with the inconsistencies associated with the chrome-lining process, or at least that made sense to me.
Personally, and realistically, I only expect minute-of-man accuracy from duty-grade barrels. I don't shoot groups, and if I happen to find that a barrel is capable of shooting a minute, it's simply because it's in the process of sighting an optic. I don't chase minutes, chase load development, waste time trying to anchor my barrel to a specific round "it likes," or anything else. I train, shoot steel, use decent ammunition, and try to do my part behind the trigger, period.
Last edited by Press Check; 07-29-18 at 13:15.
Bookmarks