Interesting results: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY1r5a_SZBc
Nevertheless, I'm still fascinated by the design.
Interesting results: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY1r5a_SZBc
Nevertheless, I'm still fascinated by the design.
Last edited by mig1nc; 07-26-18 at 06:33.
MAC uses a meter that doesn't meet milspec. No point in watching the videos for anything other than entertainment value.
True, but what's really interesting with these cans is the difference between at the ear and at the muzzle.
That much is actually illustrated in the video reasonably well.
Check it out, it's a fun watch anyway.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
They're actually not. The issue is the sampling rate isn't fast enough. So it might catch it on the upslope for one shot, the peak for another, and the down slope for a third. Not a case of "just add 3dB and it'll be right"...or "even though it's not the right number, it still indicates which one is quieter/louder". The readings are inaccurate at a random rate. It's inconsistently inconsistent.
This is truly a case of some data being worse than no data.
The manufacturer of that meter even admits it can't accurately measure a gunshot according to the milspec standard.
Bookmarks