It most definitely isn’t simple. Trump can’t block people on Twitter on 1A grounds, but they just lifetime banned McGinnes for LITERALY no reason. They State “Specifically For:” and it is blank.....
One guy in the heat of the moment drives through a crowd and anyone that might be associated with them picks up a scarlet letter, but BLM guy shoots up Dallas.... BLM guy shoots cops in AR...... a guy tries to THE LARGEST ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT IN US HISTORY and everyone tries to make Bernie Sanders feel better about himself.
And you know this is all to train the AI bots so that they can go hands-off and say that unbiased bots only see the right as dangerous.
The Second Amendment ACKNOWLEDGES our right to own and bear arms that are in common use that can be used for lawful purposes. The arms can be restricted ONLY if subject to historical analogue from the founding era or is dangerous (unsafe) AND unusual.
It's that simple.
Which assassination attempt?
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
I do think though a small private business vs a large public traded company that again got funding from tax payer is dif and should be treated dif rather than the my biz my rule since its really not their biz because of the tax money
but also why I say NO company should ever get any gov help yet Amazon and Tesla take take take and take more and sadly our stupid gov keeps giving and giving
Via Breitbart. Twitter Suspends Alex Jones After CNN Blacklist Campaign
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/...list-campaign/
These things are contagious.
And FCC shuts down his radio station
http://thehill.com/policy/technology...io-station?amp
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Last edited by Arik; 08-16-18 at 13:05.
Without being able to have dialogue or shared platforms for ideas each side will become more isolated from the other.
And likely more dangerous toward each other.
I've yet to see someones bad idea's beaten from them, it wont stop until they've killed.
Edit to add this gem.
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/...-family-story/
Shortly after Facebook came under fire for*refusing to allow*Republican Congressional candidate Elizabeth Heng*to advertise with her campaign ad*on their platform, Twitter has made the same decision. Facebook blocked the ad, which shared the story of Heng’s family being forced to flee Cambodia for the U.S., claiming that the Facebook couldn’t allow videos that contained “shocking, disrespectful, or sensational” imagery on their advertising platform. The ad was eventually approved with a Facebook spokesperson stating: “Upon further review, it is clear the video contains historical imagery relevant to the candidate’s story. We have since approved the ad and it is now running on Facebook.” A decision Twitter apparently disagrees with.
So when they get started see where this is going to go?
Last edited by Averageman; 08-16-18 at 16:24.
Bookmarks