Originally Posted by
Averageman
BTW;
As of yet all Ocasio-Cortez has won so far is a less than disputed primary election and she won because the other guy thought it was in the bag for him so like Hillary Clinton, he didn't get out there and put forth the effort.
She's a flash in the pan and nothing more.
Dr. Laura Ingraham is the latest White conservative to be branded as a RACIST! due to her daring to utter the word demographics....
With that said here is a leftist publication that puts Ocasio-Cortez's election into perspective.
Demographics” Did Help Ocasio-Cortez Win, and That’s a Good Thing
Ocasio-Cortez has been working hard to dispel what she sees as a damaging myth: the idea that her win merely reflected the makeup of her district, which is about 50 percent Latino, 40 percent Spanish-speaking, and about three-quarters people of color. The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, for instance, wrote that Crowley lost not because far-left progressives like Ocasio-Cortez are convincing voters that they can lead better than a more centrist Democratic establishment, but “because of the changing demographics in [Crowley’s] district.”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/...ood-thing.html
She won due to being:
1.) A leftist radical (had she been a conservative her race and sex would not have benefited her)
2.) A Hispanic
3.) A female
That is why the DNC as far back as the Hart–Celler Act in 1965 want an open southern border.
"In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf
"We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks