Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 81 to 84 of 84

Thread: 5.56: Fragmentation or Expansion?

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    561
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ABNAK View Post
    I've got 1K+ of the Mod 0, is the Mod 1 that much better?
    It has a little better Ballistic coefficient and it’s non lead. They pretty much the same. Mod 1 is a silver looking projectile vice copper colored.
    Hunter of Gunmen 8541

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,718
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by indianalex01 View Post
    It has a little better Ballistic coefficient and it’s non lead. They pretty much the same. Mod 1 is a silver looking projectile vice copper colored.
    Yeah first time I saw a pic of the Mod 1 I thought "Werewolf round"!
    Last edited by ABNAK; 04-10-20 at 10:42.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  3. #83
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    6,762
    Feedback Score
    11 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by indianalex01 View Post
    MK318 will frag down 1500 FPS or even lower. It’s accurate. 1.5 for the MK318 Mod 1. It is a great load. Any of the loads just mentioned are awesome though.
    Interesting. What do you base the fragmentation data on? Gel, game, industry data?

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    1,688
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The lowest velocity I've seen Mk 318 tested with came in at 1990ish, with great expansion/fragmentation. I'd also love to see the 1500fps test.
    It's f*****g great, putting holes in people, all the time, and it just puts 'em down mate, they drop like sacks of s**t when they go down with this.
    --British veteran of the Ukraine War, discussing the FN SCAR H.

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •