Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 104

Thread: CZ Bren 2 in 308!!

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    981
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bret View Post
    Less felt recoil?
    I think a brake, a can, or the design of reciprocating components are a better way to handle that. Plus you can always add weight to the rifle if you really want. Much harder to take weight off a stock rifle.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    0
    I know way less than most of you guys about long range weapons, but I would much prefer the future Bren 2 in 308 to be lighter than the Scar 17, coming in at around 7 pounds vs the 8.5 pounds it purportedly weighs.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Posts
    2,815
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Aries144 View Post
    I think a brake, a can, or the design of reciprocating components are a better way to handle that. Plus you can always add weight to the rifle if you really want. Much harder to take weight off a stock rifle.
    How would a can decrease recoil?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    981
    Feedback Score
    0
    A pound or so of added weight for one thing. Some claim that a can has a muzzle brake effect as well. I'm not sure about that one.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    75
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Aries144 View Post
    Yeah, 8.5 lbs lost it for me unless it does something crazy like shoot at or under MOA. If it's another 2 MOA gun, the SCAR17 has it beat, IMHO. What advantage does it offer for having to carry an extra pound in your arms?

    The SCAR weighs 8.0lbs according to FN. Others have weighed it at 8.2lbs.

    The Bren 2, from what we're told, weighs 8.5lbs.

    That's 0.3-0.5lb difference, not a pound.

    FWIW, I think the SCAR has this thing beat right now b/c of the real-world reputation and reliability, but the CZ certainly has potential.
    Last edited by SniperOverwatch; 09-12-18 at 21:37.
    "75% of gun owners would be just as happy with airsoft." - Failure2Stop

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    31
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SniperOverwatch View Post
    FWIW, I think the SCAR has this thing beat right now b/c of the real-world reputation and reliability, but the CZ certainly has potential.
    Agreed. The Scar is an established platform, but it was also the new kid on the block at one time. Although, I breifly owned a Scar 17S, I have never had the need to deal with FNH customer service, so I cannot speak about that. From my brief exposure, the Scar 17S is an excellent rifle. If opportunity and funds should present themselves, I would be happy to have another Scar 17.
    That said, I also highly anticipate what CZ can come up with in a 308 package. I own a Scorpion, and after some modifications, the Scorpion has morphed into an excellent little SBR. If the Bren 2 in 308 comes in at half the price of the 17S and continues to build upon the Bren 2 and Scorpion platforms, CZ will likely have a serious contender.
    Last edited by akwalk; 09-13-18 at 02:42.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    981
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SniperOverwatch View Post
    The SCAR weighs 8.0lbs according to FN. Others have weighed it at 8.2lbs.

    The Bren 2, from what we're told, weighs 8.5lbs.

    That's 0.3-0.5lb difference, not a pound.

    FWIW, I think the SCAR has this thing beat right now b/c of the real-world reputation and reliability, but the CZ certainly has potential.
    Whoops. Thanks for that. I had it in my head that the unloaded weight was 7.5lbs. I'm looking now and see that The SCAR16 is listed at 7.7lbs, and that's heavier than I remembered it being.

    With that in mind, the .308 Bren certainly looks better. If it's easier on optics and has a sturdier stock, and it accepts Magpul type mags, that's worth an extra .5 lb. So much the better if it's only .3 lbs. That's basically a SCAR with all the aftermarket upgrades, and likely at half the cost.
    Last edited by Aries144; 09-13-18 at 02:40.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    75
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Aries144 View Post
    Whoops. Thanks for that. I had it in my head that the unloaded weight was 7.5lbs. I'm looking now and see that The SCAR16 is listed at 7.7lbs, and that's heavier than I remembered it being.

    With that in mind, the .308 Bren certainly looks better. If it's easier on optics and has a sturdier stock, and it accepts Magpul type mags, that's worth an extra .5 lb. So much the better if it's only .3 lbs. That's basically a SCAR with all the aftermarket upgrades, and likely at half the cost.
    No worries.

    Yep, that says it well. They capitalized well on the SCAR's (few) shortcomings. Now we just have to wait until it gets over here. I'm guessing 2+ years.
    "75% of gun owners would be just as happy with airsoft." - Failure2Stop

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    75
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    More photos are coming out. We have video now too.



    I hope they fix the odd pattern on the plastic parts for the production guns. That charging handle could use some work too.
    "75% of gun owners would be just as happy with airsoft." - Failure2Stop

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    487
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    That thing looks pretty darn production ready. Are they going after military sales, civilian sales, or both. Is there any reason other than civilian sales that they would be producing this at this point?

Page 5 of 11 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •