MOLON......
Still waiting for your test results.....
Time frame???
MOLON......
Still waiting for your test results.....
Time frame???
SHOOT MORE -POST LESS!!
Teslong bore scope, the bane of barrel manufactures. Lol. Cheep and accessible to give people just enough knowledge to hang themselves and cause publicity problems.
Point being small burrs in the gas port and artifacts in chrome lining, shines and dull spots are common from ALL of the big fighting rifle barrel brands. Not going to drag Clint at BRT over it. It would be cool if all bores looked like a polished Criterion but even their barrels aren't always perfect looking under the bore scope.
I have gauged BCM barrels that had blown out bores. Centurion barrels that had horribly loose chambers and wicked gas port burrs, Sionics barrels with short headspace. All of these things are more important than a few artifacts in the chrome. These barrels are not single point cut, hand lapped stainless barrels and despite what anyone thinks none of the big manufactures have 100% QC on every detail when the intended performance is a 2.5 moa fighting carbine.
Last edited by jerrysimons; 11-27-22 at 21:17.
Maybe, but I don’t think so. They look negative in Molon’s bore scope pic. Like pieces of wire were stuck to the mandrel, which I also doubt. The sort of artifact that I’m used to seeing on a CHF barrel is drill marks that sort of look like chatter but are hammered flat. Its pretty common.
Bore scope pictures are like EEGs. They provide a visualization of things, but most people don’t know how to interpret them, so it all looks bad, without necessarily being bad.
RLTW
“What’s New” button, but without GD: https://www.m4carbine.net/search.php...new&exclude=60 , courtesy of ST911.
Disclosure: I am affiliated PRN with a tactical training center, but I speak only for myself. I have no idea what we sell, other than CLP and training. I receive no income from sale of hard goods.
The level of entitled hubris in your posts is pretty astounding. Molon doesn't owe you jack. And the fact that someone of his reputation for thoroughness hasn't expounded on his findings, here in the forum, should give you a clue... But you're too wrapped up in the fact that he didn't respond to your demand. Who the eff are you?
Ever stop to think that maybe he and Clint took the conversation offline?
“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our heart is restless until it rests in you.” -Augustine
Bookmarks