|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I run a 10.3" barreled upper with an Eotech as my grab-and-go but I also keep a 14.5" for situations that require a bit more range. I've started stocking the Hornady Frontier 75gr BTHP 556 for HD/SD/SHTF but I've seen a lot of guys preach SP ammo out of shorter barrels for better terminal ballistics. I know Hornady also has a 62gr SP 556 in their Frontier line and i'm wondering if that might be something to keep in the 10.3".
Reading about test done with SP ammo, it seems to be more barrier blind than HP. In this thread I see a lot of guys talking about the 64gr Speer Gold Dot SP's. Any concern about having more over penetration inside a house running SP versus running HPBT?
Overpenetration with Gold Dots is not a serious concern, in my opinion. My mags have Fusion MSR.
RLTW
“That is why there isn't an AK chart.” -SteyrAUG
“They eat tide pods also so what's your point?” Retrorevolver77
Never forget every word you spoke when you took your oath of office.
Don't confuse bonded soft point with regular soft points.
It's better to classify barrier blind vs fragmenting designs. Barrier blind can be bonded soft point, solid copper hollow point, partition, and tipped versions of the above as well. They all expand with minimal to no fragmentation and this is what makes them good through a barrier.
Plain soft point bullets in 62gr and up have just decent penetration, outside of barriers. They do not do well against barriers.
Regular soft point, HP, non bonded tipped, and OTM are in the fragmenting category. The heavier 75gr and up OTM can often do reasonably well against barriers.
The barrier blind expanding category performs more consistently, with or without a barrier, and is my preference.
Bookmarks