That's just it.
I don't want it to maintain terminal performance after striking a barrier if I miss, don't connect well, or do connect well. I want the bullet to be less deadly after it passes the bad guy one way or the other.
I understand this means that if I need to shoot through a barrier to get the bad guy a "non-barrier blind" bullet will be "less dangerous" when it gets to him. I'm willing to give that performance up if it means less bullets leave the house.
What I'm comparing directly is Federal 64 gr JSP T223L and 55 gr Gold Dot.
Last edited by Ron3; 12-22-19 at 14:05.
Sir, you seek the Grail of defense projectiles. One that turns to dust, POOF!, upon passing whatever range the bad guy is at, with zero retained kinetic energy on a miss, but liquifies a bad guy’s organs on a hit, coming neatly to rest 1” behind him on the floor. Enjoy the quest, but perfect is the enemy of good. Firearms are designed to project deadly force. If “over-penetration” is your greatest concern, buy an axe.
Last edited by 1168; 12-22-19 at 14:32.
So, your telling me .223 will penetrate people and things as much as a 9mm if I choose something "more effective" than a ballistic tip bullet that likely won't penetrate "enough" bad guy to stop him.
Then why not just use a shotgun and #1 or #4 buckshot? Two to six inches of buckshot spread will be a superior, faster wound than one or a few .223 shots and poor sectional-density soft .30 or .24 caliber pellets won't penetrate as much stuff and walls as a "more effective" .223 load.
Ron the best plan is this - don't miss the target.
Bookmarks