Justice Kavanaugh

[yoni]

If the American people reward the socialist marxist AKA Democratic party in the upcoming election.

Then G-D helps us.

The one view I have changed in my life, is universal right to vote. In the USA I now think you have to have something to lose in order to have the right to vote. Your life or your property must be at risk for your vote to count. Meaning if you served the country in the military or first responded you have the right to vote. If you own property that can be taxed you get to vote, or if you are paying income tax.

If you are living off the government tit, other than being disabled then why should you get the right to vote in marxist that will steal more from the productive members of society ?

Now my rant is over.

[Dienekes]

All doubt has now been resolved:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k

[Watrdawg]

Listening to Feinstein grill Kavanaugh on the Heller case (“assault weapons”) just pissed me off. She is so biased it is not funny. She asked how he reconciled school shooting over the Constitution. SMDH.

Actually she said how he could reconcile the HUNDREDS OF SCHOOL SHOOTINGS WITH ASSAULT WEAPONS! Absolutely absurd! This lady is so far out of reality it is unbelievable.

[fledge]

Actually she said how he could reconcile the HUNDREDS OF SCHOOL SHOOTINGS WITH ASSAULT WEAPONS! Absolutely absurd! This lady is so far out of reality it is unbelievable.

How did he reply to that?

[Averageman]

I suggest that when you take a break from that, go to YouTube and look at some of the old "Firing Line" episodes.
I think Conservatives miss having such a sharp mind and quick thinker like William F Buckley around. The ability to destroy an argument from the Left and then fillet the remains and do it with such class and intellect, that just doesn't happen anymore.

[flenna]

If the American people reward the socialist marxist AKA Democratic party in the upcoming election.

Then G-D helps us.

The one view I have changed in my life, is universal right to vote. In the USA I now think you have to have something to lose in order to have the right to vote. Your life or your property must be at risk for your vote to count. Meaning if you served the country in the military or first responded you have the right to vote. If you own property that can be taxed you get to vote, or if you are paying income tax.

If you are living off the government tit, other than being disabled then why should you get the right to vote in marxist that will steal more from the productive members of society ?

Now my rant is over.

Precisely. As a young student I thought it was horrible that at one time citizens in some states had to be a property owner or tax payer to vote. Now that I see what our country has become due to all the takers I believe maybe those people years ago were on to something.

[jmp45]

I suggest that when you take a break from that, go to YouTube and look at some of the old "Firing Line" episodes.
I think Conservatives miss having such a sharp mind and quick thinker like William F Buckley around. The ability to destroy an argument from the Left and then fillet the remains and do it with such class and intellect, that just doesn't happen anymore.

I think this generation's Ben Shapiro has that covered as well as a few others.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

She basically said that hundreds of "assault weapons" have been used in hundreds of school shootings. Hundreds, really?

You could fit all the guns and all the ammo from all the school shooting in the trunk of one car.

I think this generation's Ben Shapiro has that covered as well as a few others.

Shapiro is an assassin. He can scalp people with stunning one liners or go head-to-head for ours and break people down. Facts and rhetoric. As my newly minted teenager starts to try to argue politics with all his head full of mush friends, I have him listen to Ben to get some pointers, and he listens fairly regularly.

Imagine if ‘right-wing’ people protested like that at some alphabet group....

[Watrdawg]

How did he reply to that?

He basically went on to describe that in the Heller decision they determined that semiautomatic handguns couldn't be banned and that translated over to semiautomatic rifles also because they were so common. Feinstein then went on to state how can you say assault rifles are so common. He countered with continuing on about the decision on Heller. This is a quick down and dirty version of what went on. I'm sure there is video of that whole section of the questioning for more detail about the exchange.

[FromMyColdDeadHand]

Pretty much right on why we are at partisan battles over judges. I'd take it a step further and say there is too much trying to be done at the national level before a consensus is achieved as to how something should be addressed at a state or local level.