deleted
Last edited by RetroRevolver77; 12-18-18 at 18:06.
It falls in to the "just because you can doesn't mean you should" category.
I had a Tavor, it was cool and got a lot of attention when I shot it at the range but sucked as a battle rifle. Very short, easy to break down and clean. So close
Yoni, how much of this is the “Glock” factor - it isn’t the best at any one thing, but it is good enough all around and every aftermarket and/or development effort is going to start with it? Whatever the next hotness is, it will be built for the M4 first. There’s a lot of STANAG already in inventory, etc.
Can't speak to why some special forces seem to prefer M4, since I'm not special forces. But I do wonder how many of you that are ragging on the Tavor own one. Or even have extended time behind the trigger.
As someone who owns one and has put a couple of thousand rounds through it, I have to say that it stacks up against the AR very favorably. I would say it's more reliable, stays cleaner, is more maneuverable. Personally, because of its size and the way its weight is distributed, I find it easier to shoot offhand. Mag changes are a little more difficult, but not a problem with a little practice. Stock trigger is not great, but very easy to upgrade.
As for the accuracy being 4 MOA - that's just bullsh*t. With Wolf Gold I'm at about 2-2.5 MOA with a 3x scope at 100 yards. With match ammo I'm at about 1.5.
Last edited by cosmo223; 09-17-18 at 11:29.
deleted
Last edited by RetroRevolver77; 12-18-18 at 18:02.
Bookmarks