I think it's the only right that's unlimited-- the rest are regulated in one way or another. Some of the regulations make good sense, others not so much.

It all seems simple until you literally get down to cases, and try to apply the letter of the law to some weird, twisted case that takes two hours to explain, a flowchart to track and a long list to keep track of the names. Then if you were judge for a day, when you get down to the bottom, you're going to infringe on someone's rights no matter what you decide.

After a couple centuries of appellate action like that, I'm surprised you can still recognize the way the bill of rights is written in current law.