G&R Tactical

View Poll Results: If you were deployed to a combat zone, which can (and muzzle device) would you want?

Voters
56. You may not vote on this poll
  • Dead Air Sandman-S

    7 12.50%
  • Dead Air Sandman-K

    8 14.29%
  • SilencerCo Saker ASR 556

    0 0%
  • SilencerCo Saker ASR 556K

    1 1.79%
  • OSS HX-QD 556

    3 5.36%
  • OSS HX-QD 556K

    0 0%
  • Surefire SOCOM556-RC2

    21 37.50%
  • Surefire SOCOM556-MINI2

    8 14.29%
  • KAC QDC

    4 7.14%
  • KAC QDC CQB

    4 7.14%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: 5.56 Combat Suppressor Poll

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Lancaster, PA
    Posts
    1,115
    Feedback Score
    0
    Silencerco 556 or 556K for me because I've had mine for a while now and trust it. Accurate, good reduction, and it's done everything I've wanted it to do and I don't see any limitations on the horizon.
    "You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws...it's...insane!" -- Penn Jillette

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    635
    Feedback Score
    0
    Surefire socom556 a s socom762

    Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
    Providing NFA Trust Services to Texas Citizens

    www.AtomicLabRat.com

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Northern UT
    Posts
    3,658
    Feedback Score
    65 (100%)
    I’ve had time behind all and I’d take the OSS over all without a second thought. It’s a leap ahead in technology and zero blow back so you don’t have worry about adjustable gas blocks or messing with your buffer systems, and it won’t get carbon welded into your mounts.
    I paint spaceship parts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Stippled Glocks are like used underwear; previous owner makes all the difference in value.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    259
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VIP3R 237 View Post
    I’ve had time behind all and I’d take the OSS over all without a second thought. It’s a leap ahead in technology and zero blow back so you don’t have worry about adjustable gas blocks or messing with your buffer systems, and it won’t get carbon welded into your mounts.
    Would you take it over the Energetic Vox?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Northern UT
    Posts
    3,658
    Feedback Score
    65 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BallisticHarmony View Post
    Would you take it over the Energetic Vox?
    Until I have an opportunity to shoot one I cannot give a affirmative yes or no. Quickly reading up on it i am curious about the material it’s using and I like the ability to use the excellent dead air mounts, however it looks like a standard baffle design so the OSS has the technology and performance advantage (no blowback or ejection port noise and associated issues)
    Last edited by VIP3R 237; 10-10-18 at 15:55.
    I paint spaceship parts.

    Quote Originally Posted by Failure2Stop View Post
    Stippled Glocks are like used underwear; previous owner makes all the difference in value.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    519
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Since most on the market have about the same DB performance IMHO, I would prioritize system weight (all in with mount). Also modularity and stability of the company.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    779
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    OSS seems to be racking in some government contracts. Not just CSASS and SDMR. I've even seen footage of Korean troops using them .

    Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •