Silencerco 556 or 556K for me because I've had mine for a while now and trust it. Accurate, good reduction, and it's done everything I've wanted it to do and I don't see any limitations on the horizon.
Dead Air Sandman-S
Dead Air Sandman-K
SilencerCo Saker ASR 556
SilencerCo Saker ASR 556K
OSS HX-QD 556
OSS HX-QD 556K
Surefire SOCOM556-RC2
Surefire SOCOM556-MINI2
KAC QDC
KAC QDC CQB
Silencerco 556 or 556K for me because I've had mine for a while now and trust it. Accurate, good reduction, and it's done everything I've wanted it to do and I don't see any limitations on the horizon.
"You can't stop insane people from doing insane things with insane laws...it's...insane!" -- Penn Jillette
Surefire socom556 a s socom762
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I’ve had time behind all and I’d take the OSS over all without a second thought. It’s a leap ahead in technology and zero blow back so you don’t have worry about adjustable gas blocks or messing with your buffer systems, and it won’t get carbon welded into your mounts.
Until I have an opportunity to shoot one I cannot give a affirmative yes or no. Quickly reading up on it i am curious about the material it’s using and I like the ability to use the excellent dead air mounts, however it looks like a standard baffle design so the OSS has the technology and performance advantage (no blowback or ejection port noise and associated issues)
Last edited by VIP3R 237; 10-10-18 at 15:55.
Since most on the market have about the same DB performance IMHO, I would prioritize system weight (all in with mount). Also modularity and stability of the company.
OSS seems to be racking in some government contracts. Not just CSASS and SDMR. I've even seen footage of Korean troops using them .
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks