S&w M&P 2.0 9mm vs .45

[Ron3]

Id take a 40 min ride to actually feel the gun vs listening to reviews. Order wherever you like but at least get hands on first. Saying it's thicker/wider/shorter is one thing, felling it is another.

This thread started on 9/28. From then till now you could have taken that drive a 100 times and either bought one or moved on.

If I listened to reviews online I'd never own Glocks

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I went and ordered the .45. I can always sell it and/or get a different model. (At least in the near future)

While a Glock 20sf is a little thick for me I'm sure the M&P is less so.

I chose the .45 because my Sheild .45 is a pleasure to shoot (and i shoot it well) and I think the wider, heavier gun will be even more so.

[newyork]

Report back


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ron3]

Report back


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10-4.

[jppaul16438]

I decided to go with the 4" 9mm myself.

[Ron3]

Report back


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Well, not much to say, except I'm very happy with my purchase. I really like the 4.6" barrel.

I might be around 500 rds. No problems at all. The pistol is accurate and easier to get hits with than a Glock even though I had lots of experience with all kinds of Glocks. I've fired a few brands of ball and keep Ranger T's in it. (after firing about 75 rds of them)

The gun is fine totally stock. All I did was whiten the front sight and black out the rears. (all steel) The grip adapters are great. I use the smallest one but I could use the next size up as well. Trigger is fine. Like the .45 Shield, it recoils less than one might expect it to. I mostly use the S&W 14-rd mags because I got them cheap.

I think it's the best-shooting pistol I've had ever had. I can and have carried it concealed. But the weight does get a little old and the butt catches on some clothing. So I've been carrying the Shield .45 most of the time.