They are both hard enough to cut good threads into. "Better" isn't always better. Sometimes "better" is a waste of money for no practical gain.
And I thought we were talking about toughness (as in resistance to damage) not machinability. Move the goalposts?
In any case, the Aimpoint-published vibration and shock test limits are the same for the M5 as they are for the M4 as they are for the PRO. Saying one is "tougher" than the others without evidence is not convincing.
Last edited by Don Quijote; 10-15-18 at 09:50.
I won't be trading in my T2 for an M5/M5s, but I do plan on picking one up. That said, I really do hate the "mushiness" of the illumination adjustments on the Aimpoint micro series. It's sad when cheap Chinese red dots demonstrate a more positive click adjustment. Not that it's that important, but for what an Aimpoint costs they should be doing much better than that.
"People have always been stupid. The Internet just makes it easier for us to know about them." - donlapalma
I'm not moving goal posts. Threads in 7075 will resist pulling out better than 6061. Thread stripping was a problem with the 6061 T-1, the T-2 was 6061 with Heli-Coils, the M5 is 7075. The shock and vibration would more than likely kill the electronics before the body.
A hit that will crack 7075 will bend or dent 6061. But 6061 will bend or dent before 7075 will.
I will tell you from experience that threads in 7075 will last longer than threads in 6061. However, regardless of alloy, a bolt or screw can only be torqued in aluminum threads so many times before the aluminum threads fail and that number isn't very high.
I didn't care for the layout of the M5, but an M5s might be worth considering.
Last edited by MistWolf; 10-15-18 at 22:06.
The number of folks on my Full Of Shit list grows everyday
I am American
All true
What I don't get is why is thread stripping an issue with the T-1s. Even if Aimpoint doesn't include a torque value for the screws that hold the sight to the mount, the internet is chock full of standard torque values by fastener size and thread material. Following those guidelines, and adding some thread locker for insurance, makes the problem pretty much moot.
Here's one: https://mdmetric.com/tech/Standard_t...ing_torque.pdf
It even tells you to back torque off 50% from standard for joints with aluminum threads and other similar, softer materials. Who knew?
On the subject of thread cyclic failure, while you're correct, the joint between the sight and its mount is supposed to be semi-permanent not something that gets done and undone on a regular basis.
From Aimpoint techs.
The Comp M4 are 6061 but use use a much bigger, coarser, deeper thread than the Micros.
Yeah, the Comp M4/M4s are awesome in the toughness department. The Comp M5 is the first Micro size to be up there with it. I wish they would have used the Heli-Coils in the M5 too.
Bookmarks