Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Ruger PCC Cleaning

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    106
    Feedback Score
    0

    Ruger PCC Cleaning

    I never had a firearm that required tools to disassemble for cleaning until this Ruger PCC. You damned near need a tool box to take everything apart to get to the bolt. I've always been a meticulously kind of guy as far as cleaning goes after every range session but with this carbine, I don't see that happening. I also don't want to wear out the screws from constantly disassembling it. I'm considering just cleaning the barrel only after every range session and just calling it a day and only getting to the bolt when absolutely needed. Maybe once every 6 months.

    Question.... What's the longest you've gone without cleaning your Ruger PCC?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    55
    Feedback Score
    0
    Disclaimer i dont own one

    Honestly for a blow back gun like that i think your on the right track thinking that you will just be putting extra wear on the fastners, i would just not clean it chances are it wolnt give you problems for a really long time if ever and you won't hurt it (pure speculation)

    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Windermere, FL
    Posts
    129
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    .........
    ETA - I don't own one. Hopefully someone that does can share their experience with you.

    Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
    Last edited by 9mm_shooter; 10-12-18 at 18:25.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    66
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    I clean mine once every 500 rounds. Don't bother with the the removal of the bolt (and, thus, charging handle) until you REALLY need a DEEP clean. Not so hard. Like a 10/22 really.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Mid-West, USA
    Posts
    2,828
    Feedback Score
    63 (100%)
    The more I shoot over the years, the less I worry about cleaning unless it's 1-a duty weapon or 2-a predetermined internal (e.g. yearly. The PCC is on my wish list, and I won't treat it any differently unless it affects function.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    3,553
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by FSTRN View Post
    Not so hard. Like a 10/22 really.
    This is it, exactly.

    The PCC is, in essense, a 10/22 that's been redesigned for centerfire ammo. Add a slot on both sides of the receiver for a reversible charging handle and a plastic mag well adapter and you have a PCC.

    Straight blowback is great for a 10/22. Is it ideal for 9mm? Personally I think the gun is way too heavy for what it is. That's the nature of the beast for a blowback system. People are posting that they want Ruger to make a PCC in 10mm or 45 Auto, etc. All this will mean is an even heavier bolt and recoil spring. No thanks!

    What I'd like to see Ruger do is come up with some sort of mechanically locked breech that would shave weight off. I'd bet they could immediately take half a pound off. It would also open the door for caliber options without simply relying on the mass of the bolt.

    Down side to development is likely also increasing cost. Would people be interested in paying more for a gun that weighed a little less?

    Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
    “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    Posts
    8,741
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    Down side to development is likely also increasing cost. Would people be interested in paying more for a gun that weighed a little less?
    I like my Ruger PCC, but would not pay more for it.
    2012 National Zumba Endurance Champion
    الدهون القاع الفتيات لك جعل العالم هزاز جولة الذهاب

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    1,630
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Ruger seems to have a tendency to be hard to strip and clean.

    Their .22 target pistol Mark I through III were famously difficult. You needed a wooden dowel and a rubber mallet. Ridiculous. The Mark IV comes apart with the push of a button. That's when I bought one.

    The 10/22 needs a screwdriver, punches, a hammer, and some cussing to strip and reassemble. And you can't clean it from the breech end. I clean as seldom as possible.

    I'm not a bit surprised that another of their guns is tough to maintain.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    257
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Uni-Vibe View Post
    Ruger seems to have a tendency to be hard to strip and clean.

    Their .22 target pistol Mark I through III were famously difficult. You needed a wooden dowel and a rubber mallet. Ridiculous. The Mark IV comes apart with the push of a button. That's when I bought one.

    The 10/22 needs a screwdriver, punches, a hammer, and some cussing to strip and reassemble. And you can't clean it from the breech end. I clean as seldom as possible.

    I'm not a bit surprised that another of their guns is tough to maintain.

    I had a few MKIII's, they were a pain but I never did need a wooden dowel. Only gun I have ever had that I had to use the instructions every time to put it back together. I bought a replacement bushing for $10 from tandemkross that removed 90% of the steps and pain.

    I'm not sure what your using a punch and hammer on a 10/22 for unless your completely striping the bolt down. Otherwise a allen wrench for the stock screws and a screwdriver for putting the bolt release back in is about the only extras I need. I should notemine all have the poly lower and the pins push right in and out easy.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,868
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Uni-Vibe View Post
    Ruger seems to have a tendency to be hard to strip and clean.
    +1. I have an AC556. It makes me wonder what they were thinking. No way that you’d want GI’s field stripping such a rifle.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •