For the price, I’ve been very happy with my Sig Kilo2000 as well. I’ve also got quite a bit of time behind a Leica and was never overly impressed with it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the price, I’ve been very happy with my Sig Kilo2000 as well. I’ve also got quite a bit of time behind a Leica and was never overly impressed with it.
Yeah I haven't seen anything on Vortex like that, and based on everybody's opinions in this thread, it looks like I'll be going with a Sig K2000 or 2200. Part of the learning experience for me has also been about the distance itself, and really 2500 meters was a nice round number in my head to start with, with no real basis in application. It's obvious to me now that if I'm in a position to reach out that far, I'll know a whole lot more about things, and I have no need for that kind of power at the moment.
Thanks for all the input, this thread has been very helpful.
What about the new Nikon's with the anti-vibration tech that helps you hold it study wwhile lasing longer ranges?
For years I had a Leica 1600. I lost it. I replaced it with the Sig 2200. About a month after getting it I got out my favorite hunting coat.....something heavy in the pocket....Leica 1600....So, I took both out to the field for a couple of weeks and honestly, they returned the exact same readings across a wide spectrum of targets and light conditions. Sold my Leica on Ebay. To me, electronics are a consumable item, you can't realistically expect them to last forever so the newer unit was better to me even if identical in ability.
The truth can only offend those who live a lie.
Bookmarks