Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 97

Thread: ATF Prosecutes Ohio Man for AR Pistol with Brace

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,347
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by themonk View Post
    My assumption about how the ATF got involved was incorrect. It is still unusual that the ATF went after this guy under these circumstances.

    This thread has drifted into the topic of gun confiscation. This is an article written by Paul Howe in 2013. I think that a gun ban if very possible if the libtards end up running the show. An actual door to door confiscation....unlikely.

    2nd Amendment and the Kool-aid Drinkers
    by
    Paul Howe

    I have quietly watched and evaluated the in pouring of e-mails reference the liberal’s intent to seize guns and crush the second amendment. I want to add a few of my own thoughts on this issue as I have worked in and around all the people who could be tasked to seize your guns.

    WHO’S COMING TO GET THEM?

    United Nations (UN)
    We are the UN. Other countries mostly join the U.N. to secure money, funding and training and few have any offensive combat capability. Most serve as guards at static locations and have no will to fight. America is the enforcement arm of the U.N. We have the money, equipment, personnel and lift platforms to get the job done.

    If the president ever let the U.N. in this country, it would be a foreign invasion and armed Americans would stand up and crush them in a day. Our government would break down and the president would be ousted for letting foreign militaries invade our country.

    Federal Government Military
    Having served over 20 years in our military, I know that most soldiers would refuse the order to take part in the confiscation of weapons. First, the president would have to give the order, which is an “Illegal Order” in violation of the constitution. I don’t believe that service members would go back into the communities that raised them and conduct raids on good Americans in violation of the constitution.

    Remember, these forces would have to come from a military base that is surrounded and supported by American communities. Civilians would simply cease to support the bases and they would fold in a short time. Cut of the fuel, food, electricity on bases and this would stop the silliness. Also, many, many service members live in the communities and they would have to travel from their houses to base unless they were locked down. In that case, their families would still be in the community and people would not be too friendly to those supporting these actions.

    Federal Government DHS or TSA
    The Federal government is not large enough or talented enough to seize guns. If they were to do 5-8 raids a day seizing guns, they would be physically and mentally exhausted and need a break. Physically conducting raids is exhausting. After the first few raids, the word would get out and Americans would start to fight back. It would take one good ambush from a house or along a travel route to decimate a tactical force or make it combat ineffective.

    Next, most Federal Agencies work out of a fixed location centrally located in a community. Also, their personnel live in those communities along with their families. Once the word got out that they were doing raids in violation to the constitution, they and their families would be at risk. If they were to start raiding houses, kicking in doors and breaking in windows looking for legally owned guns, their homes would be subject to the same treatment by Americans rising up to defend themselves. They would shortly find themselves without a place to live.

    State Law Enforcement
    The Governor would have to order State and Local Law Enforcement to either:
    Seize guns
    Ignore the Federal Orders

    If they ignore the Federal Orders, things would be tense, but people would be civil. If they started to seize guns, they only have limited people and assets to do this. Much the same consequences would take place as with the Federal Government.

    Local Law Enforcement
    Local Police and Sheriff Departments are the backbone of who protects American Citizens. A Sheriff or Chief of Police would have to give the order for his people to begin to seize weapons. Their people would either comply or see it as an illegal order and refuse.

    Remember, Chiefs and Sheriff’s also have to live and work in the same communities they serve. As I described with the Federal Government, local Tactical Teams could probably only do 8-10 hits in a day and then need a break. So they hit ten houses and seize their guns, the word would get out and now they are subject to living in the same community as those they are attacking. It would not go well. Also, after one or two determined Americans or combat vets fought back, the team would lose many to death or injury and they would have made a decision whether to continue to push the fight. Remember also, they have to sleep sometime. Their homes and families would be at risk. It is an ugly scenario at best.

    Nation of Combat Veterans and Patriots
    Having been at war for over 10 years, we have a nation of combat vets and contractors that have seen more action than many of our WWII vets. It has been said that only a small percentage of Americans stood up to the British War machine in the Revolutionary War. Americans are better armed and trained today than at any time in our nation’s history. Think about what would happen if just our nation’s veterans stood up. People have been buying more guns and ammunition in the past five years than any time in my life. The guns and ammunition are out there along with the talent to use them.

    Kool-Aid Drinkers
    Kool-Aid Drinkers is the term I use to describe the Jonestown voluntarily massacre where the Peoples Temple Agricultural Project, a dedicated community western Guyana by the Peoples Temple led by cult leader Jim Jones intentionally drank poison Kool-Aid. Over 900 people died.
    In every law enforcement, government and military agency or branch, there are a small number of Kool-Aid drinkers who would blindly follow orders. They would either be purged internally by their co-workers or people they attacked would stop their gene pool.

    Also, at the police tactical team level, all members “volunteer” for the job and they can have the individual integrity to terminate their team service at any time if their profession becomes corrupt or misguided. I know many a good officer that has done that in the past.

    Finally, there would be a certain number of American Kool-Aid drinkers that would turn in their weapons if asked. I believe it would be a small percentage as there are always those that do not have the will to resist or fight and they are not needed should thing get tough.

    History of “Gun-Free Zones”
    Our nation’s history is filled with examples of “gun-free” zones failed.
    The Aurora Colorado movie massacre and the recent Connecticut shooting are two that come to mind. Also, remember the Fort Hood massacre where an Islamic extremist Major Nidal Malik Hasan killed 13 soldiers because our military bases are gun free zones. Combat trained soldiers had to be rescued by a security guard. That is embarrassing.

    Evil came to all of these places and everyone was disarmed and not ready to fight back because they were gun free zones.

    Think what would happen at a national level if the American people were disarmed. Another evil would come along either from inside our country or outside of it and resulting in our downfall.

    How about others in recent history:
    -In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control. From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    -In 1911, Turkey established gun control. From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    -Germany established gun control in 1938 and from 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
    -China established gun control in 1935. From 1948 to 1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated
    -Guatemala established gun control in 1964. From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    -Uganda established gun control in 1970. From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    -Cambodia established gun control in 1956. From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    -Defenseless people rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control: 56 million.

    Solutions
    Write your state representatives and let them know how you feel about this issue. I would like to think that most states would refuse the order.

    Next, at the local level, talk to your Sheriff or Chief of Police and ask them if they would allow or support the federal government in their confiscation of firearms. Put them on the spot now and hold them accountable. I like to think that most states would refuse the order.

    Should firearm confiscation begin, solutions are simple. If they cannot live in a community, they cannot work in a community. If their house goes away while they are at work confiscating guns, so be it. Allow them to leave with their family and what possessions they can pack in their car. Point them to California and let them know all the Hollywood types would be happy to financially support them in the fantasy land they wish to live in and that they are not welcome in Free America.

    In the end I believe that guns are the glue that hold our country together. Guns keep the government in check and the individual American safe and free. Remove guns and the government will no longer be controlled by the people. The government will control the people.
    Finally, it is claimed that the Battles of Lexington and Concord, in 1775 were started because General Gage attempted to carry out an order by the British government to disarm the population resulting in the “Shot heard round the world.”

    About the Author
    Paul R. Howe is a 20-year veteran and former Special Operations soldier and instructor. He owns Combat Shooting and Tactics (CSAT), where he consults with, trains and evaluates law enforcement and government agencies in technical and tactical techniques throughout the special operations spectrum.
    Last edited by signal4l; 11-03-18 at 08:54. Reason: Added article

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    4,420
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Those of you who won’t own title-2 items because of a fear of registration are really missing out on owning the most enjoyable types of firearms IMO. If the political climate heads toward confiscation of firearms, we are going to have a whole lot more to worry about than whether you own title-2 firearms. Think the gov is following the law and not creating a database from 4473s? I doubt it very much. I recommend diving in and owning SBRs, SBSs, cans, DDs, and (budget allowing) MGs. Life is incomplete without some title-2 firearms.
    SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT

  3. #83
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Hungary & Oregon
    Posts
    747
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    Those of you who won’t own title-2 items because of a fear of registration are really missing out on owning the most enjoyable types of firearms IMO. If the political climate heads toward confiscation of firearms, we are going to have a whole lot more to worry about than whether you own title-2 firearms. Think the gov is following the law and not creating a database from 4473s? I doubt it very much. I recommend diving in and owning SBRs, SBSs, cans, DDs, and (budget allowing) MGs. Life is incomplete without some title-2 firearms.
    I'm surrounded by it.....

    But I have several SBRs and MGs..and DD..and cans out of my orifice.

    Every single person I know is just allergic to the tax.
    I'm not...it's called insurance..



    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    I believe in peace, love and extremely violent weapons systems... just in case that whole peace-and-love thing doesn't work out.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    SWFL
    Posts
    3,112
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    Those of you who won’t own title-2 items because of a fear of registration are really missing out on owning the most enjoyable types of firearms IMO. If the political climate heads toward confiscation of firearms, we are going to have a whole lot more to worry about than whether you own title-2 firearms. Think the gov is following the law and not creating a database from 4473s? I doubt it very much. I recommend diving in and owning SBRs, SBSs, cans, DDs, and (budget allowing) MGs. Life is incomplete without some title-2 firearms.
    Agreed, I will also add that IMO, the most likely way the gun grabbers implement future gun control is not by confiscation (they know it won’t work), rather by forcing title 1 guns to become title 2. That was Senator Frankenstein’s proposal after Sandy Hook, all AR’s, etc become NFA items anyway. The next step would be to ban them as being transferable, so that when you die they are destroyed. They know this is the easiest way to get compliance in the long run. They will deal with individuals as they die off, knowing their descendants will likely not make much of a fuss as the guns are confiscated.

    I do not have a crystal ball, I actually think if we survive the next several years of gun grabbing attempts it will become almost impossible for the grabbers to implement further gun control. Look at polls from the 60s, it was something like 70-80% favored a handgun ban, the current number is 20%, the Overton window has shifted with handguns in our favor. The younger generations are actually the most pro-2a including when it comes to so called, “assault weapons.” IDK if it is the call of duty effect or what, but that is what the polls show and most Fudds tend to be from the older generation.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    11,831
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by prdubi View Post
    I'm surrounded by it.....

    But I have several SBRs and MGs..and DD..and cans out of my orifice.

    Every single person I know is just allergic to the tax.
    I'm not...it's called insurance.
    How so?
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry
    F**k China!

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,616
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Everyone who has bought a gun from me and done 4473 is NOT on the Radar as a result of that 4473.
    Quote Originally Posted by AKDoug View Post
    Five years in, and I've never been audited. Hundreds of 4473's locked away that the ATF has never seen. My only interaction with ATF was a phone call once asking me to fax them a copy of one single 4473. Talking to my other FFL friends, the only times the ATF has come knocking on them they have had a specific serial number or person they were looking for info on and they never even looked beyond that.
    If only that was the case across the board. My FFL has been in business for 45 years. He's lost count how many times he's been audited and he's never been found in violation of anything.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by fledge View Post




    Yes, his butt pad is the cap from a cane.
    SBR laws are dumb, but that guy wasn't doing himself any favors. WTF?

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    2,803
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    The truth didn't stop Mr. Prince from getting everybody paranoid and trying to drum up business for his law firm. He even suggested the angled foregrip was under question which it never was. Never let a good crisis go to waste.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    5,311
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by prdubi View Post
    I'm surrounded by it.....

    But I have several SBRs and MGs..and DD..and cans out of my orifice.

    Every single person I know is just allergic to the tax.
    I'm not...it's called insurance..



    Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
    Insurance for what? The NFA tax is a luxury tax. It doesn't insure anything.

    Andy

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,234
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    ATF opinion letters for things like SIG braces are only valid for the exact configuration submitted.
    They are not valid at all. The US Attorney is under no obligation to honor them.

Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 78910 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •