Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Building an M4 without NFA: Longer Barrel Carbine or Super-Size Pistol?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,481
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)

    Building an M4 without NFA: Longer Barrel Carbine or Super-Size Pistol?

    As previously noted in other threads, I have some weird shoulder-shape problems where I'm unable to properly shoulder a rifle stock. I had the thought that there are two ways to make an M4 NFA-compliant:

    1. Longer permanent barrel (whether go to 16" bare, or longer FH and pin-and-weld)
    2. Build an "Other Firearm" super-pistol using an SBM4 brace and pistol tube instead of a stock

    I'd LIKE to keep an unpinned FH if I can so that as "current issue" configurations evolve I can update the build with them, or can more readily retrofit different cans if by some miracle HPA/similar passes someday. I know that for a typical user the "shoulder pocket" and third point of contact is rather important, but since that third point is unavailable for me and I use kind of a "push-pull" grip where my trigger hand pushes as my support hand pulls on the AFG/VFG/handstop, which option would you follow for a "Current Issue-ish" build?

    A. 16" unpinned rifle
    B. 14.5" pin-and-weld rifle
    C. 14.5" unpinned, no-stock "super-sized pistol"
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    13,150
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    As previously noted in other threads, I have some weird shoulder-shape problems where I'm unable to properly shoulder a rifle stock. I had the thought that there are two ways to make an M4 NFA-compliant:

    1. Longer permanent barrel (whether go to 16" bare, or longer FH and pin-and-weld)
    2. Build an "Other Firearm" super-pistol using an SBM4 brace and pistol tube instead of a stock

    I'd LIKE to keep an unpinned FH if I can so that as "current issue" configurations evolve I can update the build with them, or can more readily retrofit different cans if by some miracle HPA/similar passes someday. I know that for a typical user the "shoulder pocket" and third point of contact is rather important, but since that third point is unavailable for me and I use kind of a "push-pull" grip where my trigger hand pushes as my support hand pulls on the AFG/VFG/handstop, which option would you follow for a "Current Issue-ish" build?

    A. 16" unpinned rifle
    B. 14.5" pin-and-weld rifle
    C. 14.5" unpinned, no-stock "super-sized pistol"
    Have you thought about a 12.5 barreled "pistol"? It is getting you pretty much the best of all worlds.


    If you are set on a "currentish" build, just get a BCM or 6920 and be done.
    Stick


    Board policy mandates I state that I shoot for BCM. I have also done work for 200 or so manufacturers within the firearm community. I am prior service, a full time LEO, firearm instructor, armorer, TL, martial arts instructor, and all around good guy.

    I also shoot and write for various publications. Let me know if you know cool secrets or have toys worthy of an article...


    Flickr Tumblr Facebook Instagram RECOILMAGAZINE OFF GRID RECOIL WEB

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,481
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Stick, I have a 12.5 I'm penciling out if I can ever find any documentation to the claim I saw about some West Coast Navy units combining 10.75" URX II's with 12.5" barrels as a "poor man's version" of your unicorn, or if they ever put together another documented 12.5" mil-issue configuration, and a 10.3 pistol modeled after a CASV-based build I'd seen attributed to some USN EOD guys here on the WC that's in Weight/Balance Mockup and concepted as a "Briefcase/Bugout Bag CCW." (Catch is, I got one of the last CASV-ELs Vltor had, and had to make do with Foliage Green--which ended up making for a cohesive "theme" because most of my preferred furniture I used to get huge markdowns on by buying OD rather than black or FDE.) BCM was pretty much going to be the URG builder of choice no matter what path this one took, since I'm one of those "special snowflakes" that likes DIY. That said, if a sale on 6920's and my budget find an agreeable meeting place, it was a Short List option too.

    Purely unfettered by any "lookalike" requirement, I'm also toying with the idea of combining a LAW sidefolder/A5 buffer/SBM4 brace and a Dolos takedown front end for a "Quick Change" briefcase-carry setup that with interchangeable barrel/HG's could go from PDW/Active Shooter Response to Patrol Carbine or maybe even limited Countersniper in a matter of seconds just by swapping front halves. Problem is, if the optic for longer-range can't reliably hold zero between detach/reattach I think this one's just another visit from the Good Idea Fairy...
    Last edited by Diamondback; 11-15-18 at 00:57.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    71
    Feedback Score
    0
    I live where you live, I've done some reading and asked stupid questions from folks here in Seattle.

    I concluded that there's no way to legally buy an M4 (meaning a selective fire weapon) in Washington State. I concluded that if I wanted to own any selective fire weapon, I'd have to move to Idaho.
    "When I have your wounded." -- Major Charles L. Kelly, callsign "Dustoff", refusing to acknowledge that an L.Z. was too hot, moments before being killed by a single shot, July 1st, 1964.

    Black Lives Matter. All confederate symbols and monuments need to go.
    Proud to live in a sanctuary city.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,481
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Jammer, omitted from mention was the implied deletion of Select Fire--"as close as possible while staying Title I."
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    1,602
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    A. 16" unpinned rifle - If you plan on getting a suppressor anytime in the near future

    B. 14.5" pin-and-weld rifle - If there is no plan on getting a suppressor for it. If you are waiting on the HPA to pass, it may be some time before that ever happens, especially since the Democrats will control the House.

    I would not mess around building a pistol, especially since your only intention, by admission, it to only shoulder-fire it. There is a wide assortment of stocks that were used on the M4s in service and any one of those may yield one that is more comfortable for you to shoulder.
    "A Bad Day At The Range Is Better Than A Great Day Working"

    USMC Force Recon 1978-1984
    US Air Force Res. 1995-2004 (Air Transportation)
    M16/AR15 shooter since 1978, gun collector and AR builder since 2004

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,383
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade04 View Post
    If you are waiting on the HPA to pass
    Who believes that these days? If someone does, please tell me what they are smoking, because I'd like some of that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,481
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade04 View Post
    I would not mess around building a pistol, especially since your only intention, by admission, it to only shoulder-fire it. There is a wide assortment of stocks that were used on the M4s in service and any one of those may yield one that is more comfortable for you to shoulder.
    Renegade, I have no intention of shouldering this thing or any other long-ish arm, because as I said previously I'm physically UNABLE to do so--my usual technique has stocks or braces ratcheted down as short as possible, either just "floating in space" with no shoulder contact or more commonly tucked into my elbow joint. (Best comparison is something akin to how you'd hold a Chicago Typewriter if you were bringing it up to use the sights rather than spray-and-pray.) Sounds odd, looks chicken-wing odd, but so far works for me where more conventional options don't. "Improvise, Adapt, Overcome," right?
    Last edited by Diamondback; 11-15-18 at 12:19.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Pensacola, FL
    Posts
    1,602
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    Renegade, I have no intention of shouldering this thing or any other long-ish arm, because as I said previously I'm physically UNABLE to do so--my usual technique has stocks or braces ratcheted down as short as possible, either just "floating in space" with no shoulder contact or more commonly tucked into my elbow joint. (Best comparison is something akin to how you'd hold a Chicago Typewriter if you were bringing it up to use the sights rather than spray-and-pray.) Sounds odd, looks chicken-wing odd, but so far works for me where more conventional options don't. "Improvise, Adapt, Overcome," right?
    Gotcha. That does place you in an awkward predicament. I do not know that a brace will be any better for you than a stock in that case. The only deciding factor for you would be the barrel length in that a brace, as much as I hate them, would allow you to run pistol build with a 14.5" barreled upper without having to pin and weld the FH.
    "A Bad Day At The Range Is Better Than A Great Day Working"

    USMC Force Recon 1978-1984
    US Air Force Res. 1995-2004 (Air Transportation)
    M16/AR15 shooter since 1978, gun collector and AR builder since 2004

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    SeattHELL, Soviet Socialist S***hole of Washington
    Posts
    8,481
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    TBH, most of the use I get from Rear-End Furniture is as tail-weight to help improve balance, something I figured out while handling an 07/SOT friend's TSMG's. Sometimes as a carrier for spare mags, but mostly as ballast. The stubby little arms (I'm 5'6", IIRC around like a 9-10" LOP) don't help much either, LOL.

    OTOH, if I stick to pin-weld or 16" w/stock, that allows flexibility so that others in the household can use it if needed rather than being as primary-user-specific as the "briefcase special" project. 6920OEM1 has a certain "keep it simple" appeal as a starting point... and since this is planned as one half a His/Hers set, it would probably be a good idea to ensure that either of use can use either iron in case one breaks while on the range.
    <><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
    YOU IDIOTS! I WROTE 1984 AS A WARNING, NOT A HOW-TO MANUAL!--Orwell's ghost
    Psalms 109:8, 43:1
    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF; FPC MEMBER Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •