Originally Posted by
GTF425
Army, 2008-2016 OEF x 35 months
Most lacking? Training.
Nailed it.
With our M4A1's w/ ACOGs & PEQ15's loaded with M855A1 there's zero to complain about without nit picking (like that I prefer the TA11 over the TA31F we're issued) when it comes to hardware. Most of our Joes are using older M68's that have seen better days, but I've been bugging our XO and HQ enough that we're getting some of the Aimpoint M4's (newer M68's) and the older 68's at least functioning again. Our M240L's run like raped apes, and our our M249's are ok. My only legit hardware gripe is I can't stand the M320 and want our M203's back. And that's apparently user preference...
I ran a CQB M4A1 range over the summer for my Company and was amazed how many guys had issues running their weapons. Bone dry weapons causing minor FTF issues that were easily cleared using SPORTS and yet they'd just stare at it with a dumb look on their face. This even included a goddamn SSG. They also keep passing around beat to death mags that just got made worse by mandating we can't use personal mags anymore (I do anyway). You can't make this up.
As bad as things are with M4A1's, we get WAY more training with those than our belt feds. SAWs require a lot of time and experience to learn how to not only keep them running but also keep your cone of fire tight at 600-700m, and we're getting only one or two ranges a year with limited ammo. We did one a few months ago and they gave us zero tracers... yes, seriously.
As much as I want us to have 600m known and unknown ranges, I'd love to see us go back to mastering the BASICS.
ETA: I'm in a Nasty Girl Infantry unit, I'm sure Active Duty is in better shape
Last edited by kaltesherz; 12-12-18 at 20:56.
PRAISE THE FALLEN
SSG Kevin Roberts KIA 7-May-08
1Lt Nick Dewhirst KIA 20-July-08
Cpl Charles Gaffney KIA 24-Dec-08
Spc Peter Courcy KIA 10-Feb-09
PFC Jason Watson KIA 10-Feb-09
Bookmarks