I've had G19s and G17s with RMRs and WMLs. They're excellent guns. If I were putting around Syria and Iraq in a beat-up old Toyota Corolla watching suspected Islamists or self-guided tours of Russian military sites in Crimea, they're what I'd want in my holster.
But for me and the situations I'm probable to encounter to (about) the ninth sigma, the selection of which quality, full-sized fighting handgun I carry won't play a meaningful role in my success or failure. So I'll stick to my 1911.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
It happens to the best of us. Happened to me, almost 13 years ago.
I think there's something going on with shooters here. The 1911 was legendary for its reliability, never mind mud, sand, etc. People from Jeff Cooper on down swore by it. Soldiers and lawmen praised it. People thought, if you have a 1911 in your hand, you're safe from thuggery.
Now that the plastic guns are out, it's a fragile antique that falls apart every 40 rounds.
Something like this goes on with ammo, too. Silvertips were awesome crook-stoppers. Then came Hydra-Shok, and those Silvertips became ineffective nerf-bullets. Then came SXT, and Hydra-Shok suddenly couldn't stop a bunny-rabbit. Next month it'll be something else, and SXT will be the new widowmaker.
Don't take this the wrong way but are you for real?
1911s were the bleeding edge of early 1900s autopistols. They were, quite frankly, outmoded by 1935.
You seem to think that no 1911 failed in WWII, Korea, or Vietnam. You seem to further think that folks were zapping Charlie with something other than ball ammo. You seem to forget that people with a choice were very much rocking Hi Powers and later Beretta 92s. You seem to forget that for a lot of good contributions Jeff Cooper made to modernizing combat handgunnery; he had a few steps back as well (Scout Rifles? Seriously....a short bolt action with a scope....nevah been done befo')
Recognize a 1911 for what it is and what it isn't. There are a LOT of cheap, garbage 1911s out there that really are total junk.
A well made 1911 starts getting expensive for the privilege of owning a gun that was state of the art a century ago. I like 1911s, but reality is reality.
Pretty much all the people who have been to the upper tiers of close quarters combat and used 1911s will tell you that there are a lot of drawbacks, almost no advantages in the current era, and that it takes a lot of end user competence to keep them reliable by current standards.
A well made, base 1911 has a lot of simplicity, but still requires care.
You are free to like what you want and shoot what you want but it isn't healthy to romanticize a gun like that.
It's the same with M-14s. People get this image of a square jawed Marine route stepping though the jungle with a rifle of iron and wood chambered in a Man's Caliber but take off the Sex Glasses for a minute and you'll find a finicky, over complex and pointless rifle that was obsolete years before it was adopted.
The AR-10 was torpedoed unfairly because some big head in charge was again wearing sex goggles and thinking about how cool it would be to have a Garand with a magazine.
1911s can freeze, rust shut, have horrid extractor problems, break slide levers, have stirrups die, have the leaf bent too much, etc. etc.
But....you do you
Bookmarks