Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 62

Thread: MRO Opinions?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    149
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Huge disliker of them. Image shift, blurry with both eyes open and also doubling targets past 15m or so- just an an awful pos in my experience. Both pre, and >89k serials. Tried to like it, have looked through many different ones, and just find it to be a massive, massive piece of sh*t. If my life depended on it I'd rather point shoot

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,652
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Torquetard View Post
    Huge disliker of them. Image shift, blurry with both eyes open and also doubling targets past 15m or so- just an an awful pos in my experience. Both pre, and >89k serials. Tried to like it, have looked through many different ones, and just find it to be a massive, massive piece of sh*t. If my life depended on it I'd rather point shoot
    So you are not an MRO fanboy??

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    459
    Feedback Score
    0
    Threads like this goes to show that once again everyone's eyes are different.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    4,652
    Feedback Score
    11 (92%)
    Quote Originally Posted by mebiuspower View Post
    Threads like this goes to show that once again everyone's eyes are different.
    And that some never open their eyes at all.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,825
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)

    MRO Opinions?

    Deleted

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    I don't really care for them. They have a bit of a "fish eye" distortion going on and large shifts when the dot is not in the center of the optic. The MRO is basically a RMR.

    I am currently running this: http://www.gandrtactical.com/Vortex-...H-1_p_890.html

    I love the reticle and that it isn't an EOTech. Probably the best valued RDS on the market IMHO.


    C4

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    652
    Feedback Score
    10 (100%)

    MRO Opinions?

    I’m not crazy about my MRO. For whatever reason the dot is not as clear as my Aimpoints or EoTechs with my astigmatism. I’d like to see a green reticle MRO. Anyone try one?

    ______

    Grant,

    First, that’s a heck of a price...

    I am interested in one of these and looked at one at my local shop the other day. I’m reading mostly favorable reviews but your opinion carries some weight.

    A couple questions please. How is the integrated mount? Decent? I’m still kind of on the fence with the size. It just seems big and bulky to me. It was not mounted on a gun when I was playing with it. Do you notice the size/bulk?

    I also liked the reticle. I like my Eotechs.

    Thanks.

    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    I don't really care for them. They have a bit of a "fish eye" distortion going on and large shifts when the dot is not in the center of the optic. The MRO is basically a RMR.

    I am currently running this: http://www.gandrtactical.com/Vortex-...H-1_p_890.html

    I love the reticle and that it isn't an EOTech. Probably the best valued RDS on the market IMHO.


    C4



    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    Last edited by arptsprt; 01-10-19 at 20:06.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    634
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    What I like about the MRO is that you from "OFF" to a usable setting. You don't have to toggle through a bunch of settings to get to one of the ones you use the most. And, no, I don't leave mine on all the time because I have other carbines with other optics that I use as well.
    Quote Originally Posted by signal4l View Post
    I have an astigmatism. The mro works much better for me than my old T1. I use an absolute Co witness mount. I look through the rear aperture for longer shots if I need to clean up the dot
    The two reasons I bought a half dozen of these for all my rifles (10/22, H&R 300 Blk, AR's, Sig 556r)

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    2,044
    Feedback Score
    16 (100%)
    Looks like it's a crap shoot. I've always been told by people smarter than me that the red dot is preferable and easier to see for the way our eyes work. FWIW I haven't used an Eotech in decades, just Aimpoints and ACOG's other than variables. Maybe I just need to buy another T-1 or 2 or make the jump to the LPVO. I've always paid high dollar for optics anyway. Vortex intrigues me and maybe I need to try one or two but if it wasn't Aimpoint, Trijicon, or Nightforce I passed. I always liked the size and weight of the T-1's but maybe it's time to expand my horizons.
    "The peace we have within us is most often expressed in how we treat others"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    107
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I've owned just about every rds and holographic on the market. The MRO was my least favorite, like others said, image shift, blue tint and huge parallax shift. I'm back on Eotech at the moment, enjoy the completely tint free glass and huge field of view.

    I've owned a few LPVO's and could never get on board. They sound great in theory, but they add at least 1.5 lbs to the rifle and the eye relief/eye box issues are irritating to me. Definitely useable and versatile, but I've went back zero magnification and couldn't be happier.

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •