Originally Posted by
boltcatch
Being "not hazardous" to a specific regulatory guideline doesn't mean what you seem to think it means. Note the "respiratory irritation" part.
Motor oil is not intended to be used in an application where it's atomized and blown in your face to breathe in, and while the synthetic base oils are usually pretty much non-toxic (this is why they're used for all sorts of gun-specific oils), you do NOT want to breathe in stuff that is in a lot of auto-specific oil additives. Zinc is the first additive that comes to mind
What I’m questioning is exactly where most of the carcinogens are coming from- the synthetic motor oil or the fouling from the firing of the ammo carried in the oil. If the later than theoretically any lube would carry the same crap.
The reason for the question is that most of the data on motor oil toxicity states that clean oil is pretty harmless but dirty oil is pretty bad. I understand we are comparing guns and combustion engines, but the detonation of ammunition potentially creates equal if not worse carcinogens....namely lead and mercury.
Just a hypothesis...
Last edited by OldState; 01-14-19 at 23:05.
"A flute without holes, is not a flute. A donut without a hole, is a Danish." - Ty Webb
Bookmarks