- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
I thought the second one had better gunplay, but the first one had a better story.
(Dude kills a bunch of mobsters who killed his dog, stole his car, pissed on his wife's grave, and killed his sensei) > (Dude kills a bunch of mobsters because a different mobster burned his house down, and then kills the bunch of mobsters who burned his house down)
The first three Bourne movies were pretty good. Should have ended it there. The last one, though, yeah, that one was total, flaming trash.
" Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
- Samuel Adams -
"John Wick 2" was a decent showcase for the Benelli M4.
Are you gents referring to movie number four The Bourne Legacy (2012) with Jeremy Renner or movie number five Jason Bourne (2016) where they brought Matt Damon back?
Technically those are number five and six in the franchise if you count the original The Bourne Identity TV (mini-series) from 1988 but meh.
"In a nut shell, if it ever goes to Civil War, I'm afraid I'll be in the middle 70%, shooting at both sides" — 26 Inf
"We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them." — CNN's Don Lemon 10/30/18
Star Trek #2 was also better than the first. In fact, a lot of them were better than the first.
Halle Berry and attack dogs...I'm in.
The first Matrix was groundbreaking in the way it was filmed. The problem with the last two Matrix movies (other than they weren’t as good as the first) is they didn’t line up with the first movie. In the first Neo and his merry band of men, and women, were trying to save humanity from being used as human batteries for the machines. In the last two they were just trying to save “Zion” and the poor souls that were plugged up were forgotten about.
Philippians 2:10-11
To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine
“The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.
Agreed, one of the rare examples, but also a unique example with changing casts, etc.
Terminator was the classic, T2, was OK, but it didn't even approach the first, and after that, meh.
My understanding, they always intended it as a trilogy, with the risk averse studio putting limits on the first so it was stand alone if it tanked.
See above, but while 1 was the best, all were good, and on watching them multiple times, actually got better. The unplugged humans were going to be wiped out and were fighting a last stand fight, I can see why saving the those being used as batteries a secondary concern, and they did a good job of showing that only Neo actually being fully integrated into the Matrix would save the few humans left in Zion from being wiped out totally. The machines were winning and "we" were losing, and a deal struck between Neo and the head Matrix mind is what prevented it to now fight a common foe. I'd actually like to see #4 at this point as it was still left someone open ended.
- Will
General Performance/Fitness Advice for all
www.BrinkZone.com
LE/Mil specific info:
https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/
“Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”
Bookmarks