Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: New NFA SCOTUS case

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    15,429
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    The SCOTUS has become a political football.
    They don't want to take a stand on anything controversial.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,013
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by OldState View Post

    If we are to learn anything from the anti gunners it’s that it’s better to aim really high and compromise from there. If Diane Feinstien was on our side she would going after the Hughes Amendment and taking machine guns off the NFA.
    No she'd be going after the Sporter Clause.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    SWMT
    Posts
    8,188
    Feedback Score
    32 (100%)
    Last I remembered hearing a liberal talking about the NFA, it was to add semi-autos to it, on account of there being virtually no crimes committed with NFA registered firearms.

    I think that, if we see the Dems move on the NFA, it would be to add semi-automatic firearms to it.
    " Nil desperandum - Never Despair. That is a motto for you and me. All are not dead; and where there is a spark of patriotic fire, we will rekindle it. "
    - Samuel Adams -

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,853
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by MountainRaven View Post
    Last I remembered hearing a liberal talking about the NFA, it was to add semi-autos to it, on account of there being virtually no crimes committed with NFA registered firearms.
    Best I can recall, the only registered machine guns used in crimes have been used by cops.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    McKinney, Texas
    Posts
    820
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jsbhike View Post
    Best I can recall, the only registered machine guns used in crimes have been used by cops.
    Liberals believe that what they see on TV shows and movies are reality. Therefore, automatic weapons are used in crimes with regularity.

    Sent from my G8341 using Tapatalk

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    6,853
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by grnamin View Post
    Liberals believe that what they see on TV shows and movies are reality. Therefore, automatic weapons are used in crimes with regularity.

    Sent from my G8341 using Tapatalk
    Peon level probably true, upper echelon not so much. And anti-gun crap is unfortunately not just a characteristic of libs.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,013
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by grnamin View Post
    Liberals believe that what they see on TV shows and movies are reality. Therefore, automatic weapons are used in crimes with regularity.

    Sent from my G8341 using Tapatalk
    Automatic weapons ARE used in crimes, no better than the North Hollywood Bank Robbery as an example. The difference is REGISTERED automatic weapons are rarely used in crimes and have only been done so in a few instances since 1934.

    But criminals regularly manufacture machine guns from semi autos of all kinds because they don't care if it's illegal, and if they are importing illegal narcotics, it's just as easy to import illegal weapons. I seem to remember one incident from the late 80s or early 90s where some crips n bloods types were actually able to order factory AK rifles from Russia brought in through the usual ports their drugs came in on.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,319
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    I put the chances of them granting cert at about 20%. Kavanaugh could be the key here, as I think Alito, Thomas, and Gorsuch would all grant it. No way Roberts does. If they do grant cert, the opinion will be incredibly nuanced with limited scope and could easily just be a plurality opinion, since there's no telling how Roberts would hold.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •