Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: New NFA SCOTUS case

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,670
    Feedback Score
    29 (100%)

    New NFA SCOTUS case

    Just read this on some clickbait page. I am hopeful, but I won't hold my breath.

    Review: the entire MFA is a regulatory scheme and the NFA has punishments greather than failing to pay $200 to the IRS.

    https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/17...WQeN3JLsVi9LLM
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    Marines love CLP. Chow, libo, pussy.

    Beyond that everything else is a crap shoot.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    565
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    If that case does anything to mitigate the NFA in any tangible way I will eat a pmag.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,029
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by nimdabew View Post
    Just read this on some clickbait page. I am hopeful, but I won't hold my breath.

    Review: the entire MFA is a regulatory scheme and the NFA has punishments greather than failing to pay $200 to the IRS.

    https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/17...WQeN3JLsVi9LLM
    This is dangerous ground, they could agree and adjust the NFA tax for inflation. This is not where we want to start. If we want to do anything "meaningful" we need to go after the sporter clause. If we win, we win everything. If we lose, things stay as they currently are.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    565
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    This is dangerous ground, they could agree and adjust the NFA tax for inflation. This is not where we want to start. If we want to do anything "meaningful" we need to go after the sporter clause. If we win, we win everything. If we lose, things stay as they currently are.
    Well they can't just order it adjusted for inflation. That'd require congressional legislation.

    Well... if the rule of law mattered at all, that is.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,029
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Leuthas View Post
    Well they can't just order it adjusted for inflation. That'd require congressional legislation.

    Well... if the rule of law mattered at all, that is.
    I doubt SCOTUS will even hear it, but pop it on the radar and the next thing you know Congress discovers there are people with "legal machine guns" and they decide to look at the 1934 NFA and determine it needs updating.

    Because of how gun laws work, the 1934 NFA is the LAST one on the list. If you open it up for discussion, rulings or amendments it will probably only get bad. Nobody is going to say "Hey that's not really fair, let's open up the registry." You will see Heroin vending machines in middle schools before anything beneficial happens regarding the NFA.

    If you really want to improve anything, all our efforts should be devoted to striking the "sporter clause" of the 1968 Gun Control Act. The last time anything was changed was back in 1986 with the Firearm Owners Protection Act so it's been done once.

    If you remove the "sporter clause" from the 1968 GCA, you eliminate the basis for:

    1968 Foreign Machine Gun Ban.
    1986 Domestic Machine Gun Ban.
    1989 Semi Auto Import Ban.
    Any domestic semi auto ban.
    Any ban concerning ammunition.

    All of it just dies. With that accomplished you would have a more solid foundation to go after the 1934 NFA if inclined, but with the registry open I'm sure people would gladly pay a $200 tax to build or import brand new machine guns.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    565
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Agree. Thus the vow to eat pmags.
    Nobody ever got shot climbing over the wall into East Berlin.

    Delivering the most precision possible, at the greatest distance possible, with the highest rate of fire possible.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    North Alabama
    Posts
    5,312
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    I would like the SBS/SBR ruling changed to a minimum barrel length of 14" for rifles and shotguns both.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,137
    Feedback Score
    50 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SteyrAUG View Post
    This is dangerous ground, they could agree and adjust the NFA tax for inflation. This is not where we want to start. If we want to do anything "meaningful" we need to go after the sporter clause. If we win, we win everything. If we lose, things stay as they currently are.
    This is what I have been saying to those who would listen... We absolutely do not want to open the National Firearms Act, in general. Things won’t get better.
    “God doesn’t need your good works, but your neighbor does.” - Luther

    Quote Originally Posted by 1168
    7.5” is the Ed Hardy of barrel lengths.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    S.E. PA
    Posts
    1,700
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JediGuy View Post
    This is what I have been saying to those who would listen... We absolutely do not want to open the National Firearms Act, in general. Things won’t get better.
    The very first thing I thought.

    I noticed Feinstein’s new AWB referenced pistol braces...which makes me feel they are doing more research in this area. They may already have people making noise about the $200.
    "A flute without holes, is not a flute. A donut without a hole, is a Danish." - Ty Webb

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    The Sticks, TN
    Posts
    4,183
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JediGuy View Post
    This is what I have been saying to those who would listen... We absolutely do not want to open the National Firearms Act, in general. Things won’t get better.
    Would I like to see a reversal of the asinine NFA laws? Absolutely. But that will never be, at best they will stay the same.
    Philippians 2:10-11

    To argue with a person who renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead. ~ Thomas Paine

    “The greatest conspiracy theory is the notion that your government cares about you”- unknown.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •