I don’t even know WTF you’re on about half the time 7N6.
I like AKS. I have them in 5.45, 5.56, 7.62x39, and when all is said and done my FPK is a big AK in 7.62x54R.
Outfitted in various wood, polymer, metal, side mounts, top cover adapters, etc.
The cost advantage of AK vs AR is no more.
The ammo cost advantage is no more.
The cost to outfit, and end result of outfitting is a cost disadvantage.
The suitability of very offset optics or ability to co-witness is a disadvantage.
Modern magazine followers make reliability comparisons mute.
Cost for cost accuracy is a disadvantage.
Manual of arms and ergonomics are a disadvantage. No matter how fast you get with an AK or your AUG, you can be faster with an AR.
I love and have cars with carburetors and manual transmissions as well. But I could hop in my Hemi Challenger or Coyote Mustang and out perform them with a lot of advantages. Sure, I can do upgrades and fuel delivery changes and new suspension and frame installs, and get the performance and handling on par, then Spend a ton more to get the same safety, convenience, comfort, etc. but it’s not an advantage to do so.
Right now, the AR owns ergonomics for selector and mag release. You could improve the charging handle and BHO/BR ergonomics. You could improve portability with a true folding stock compatible operating system. Some would argue for better ambidextrous, barrel changes, etc. but half the endeavors shot themselves in the foot doing that and failed to do core issues.
Every other platform I have tried has a variety of disadvantages. Ranging from the magwell not being 100% compatible with what you can stick in an AR, to less ergonomic selector, less accuracy, less ergonomic mag release, very high rail CS stock height, expense, trigger, non compatible/non changeable pistol grip, shitty intrinsic sights, top rail durability, and I could keep going.
How many platforms have fallen by the wayside on those endeavors?
“Where weapons may not be carried, it is well to carry weapons.”
Bookmarks