Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: The Ayoob Files: "F*** You and Your Automatic Rifle!" - The Gary Fadden incident...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,070
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)

    The Ayoob Files: "F*** You and Your Automatic Rifle!" - The Gary Fadden incident...

    Situation: A road-rage incident escalates into a deadly pursuit.

    Lesson: Keep communications as handy as your gun. Bad guys fear resolutely armed people, not weapons. Remember that full auto can stop a fight--but start an indictment.

    It's amazing how often a criminal will say something unbelievably stupid just before he forces a decent citizen to kill him. For many years I've been piecing together a book subtitled "Famous Last Words of Scumbags." The working title will come from the most memorable such incident: "F*** You and Your Automatic Rifle!"

    The shooter was Gary Fadden. The incident took place some 20 years ago. Only now is Gary comfortable speaking of it, in hopes that others may learn from lessons that cost him very deeply.


    The Incident

    Sunday, February 24, 1984, approximately 2 PM. Gary Fadden, 26, and his lovely 22 year old fiancee are driving from a birthday party in Martinsburg, WV, into Virginia to look at some property for what they hope will be their starter home after their marriage. It's a bitterly cold day, and with the winter coats in the back of a new '84 Ford F-250 supercab 4WD diesel pickup, the Pendleton-clad Fadden looks from a distance like a harmless Yuppie. That means he and the pretty brunette look like prey to another kind of person.

    Heading east on Rt. 50, they are passed by a Harley-Davidson motorcycle with two people astride, the operator cutting in front of him so sharply that he has to brake suddenly. Gary comments to his fiancee how cold they must be riding a bike on a low 30s day, and that driving as carelessly as he is, the cyclist needs to worry about sudden patches of ice.

    A few minutes later, he spots a Chevy pickup in his rearview mirrors. It contains three people. One passenger is gesturing to him to pull over. Gary doesn't know what these scruffy guys want and he ignores them. But then he sees the passenger waving a knife, and the driver bringing up a revolver.

    Gary says to his fiancee, in what will probably be the understatement of his life, "We've got a bit of a problem here."


    Pursuit

    It is 1984, long before the universal coming of cell phones, and there is no other communications in the vehicle. They are entering Middleburg, a town of perhaps 800, and stop at a red light. Behind them, Gary can see both males exit their truck and run toward him. The driver's hand is actually on Gary's door handle when he pops the clutch and sends his new truck screeching through the intersection against the light. The two men run back to their older pickup, and the chase is on.

    They're almost on his bumper. Gary accelerates, hitting open road now, zig-zagging between reaching 95 miles an hour when the speed governor cuts in. Not only are the pursuers keeping pace but he sees the driver aiming a revolver at him out his window. Honking his horn and flashing his lights when he runs into a cluster of automobiles, passing them sometimes on the shoulder of the road and spraying rooster-tails of gravel, Gary still cannot elude the truck behind him.

    Gary is desperately looking for a police car he can flag down. He doesn't see one. The chase has gone for 22 miles now and they're getting into a more compact area again. Coming up is an intersection he knows well: he goes through it every day on his way to work. Even on Sunday it will be clogged. He forms a plan quickly: if the light is in his favor, he'll go through it and keep going, hoping to find police in a more populated area. If the light is against him, he'll turn right, and make for the plant where he works on Chantilly Road.

    The light stays red. Gary cuts hard right, heading for what he hopes will be the sanctuary of the workplace. Behind him, he can see that the pursuers haven't given up an inch. "I've got my pass card through the gates and the front door," he tells his fiancee urgently. "We'll get into the building and we can hide. They can't find us. We'll call the cops from there."

    He pulls into the front area of the plant, the automatic mechanism taking an achingly long time to raise the gate. As the gate opens, the pursuing truck comes to a stop behind his, both men jumping out and running to Gary's Ford, their hands clawing at his door handles. He guns the engine and gels away from them, sweeping up to the front door and locking up the brakes in a skid.

    The plant is Heckler and Koch.

    Gary Fadden is a salesman for HK, and along with the rest of their firearms, he sells machine guns. In the truck with him is a competitor's weapon he has acquired to test, a Ruger AC556, the selective-fire assault version of the .223 Mini-14. He grabs it now as he throws open the truck door, hoping to hold them off at gunpoint. Gary knows his fiancee can't make it to the building's door now, and he screams to her to get down on the floor of the Ford.


    The Shooting

    The passenger is running toward him, an average size man in ratty clothes with stringy hair, a long beard, and an expression of absolute rage.

    The selector switch and manual safety of the AC556 are in two different locations. Gary has not yet fired this weapon and, though he has taken off the safety, he doesn't know whether the switch is set for semi, three-shot burst, or full auto. He yells "Stop or I'll shoot," points the muzzle upward, and pulls the trigger for a warning shot.

    The weapon is set on full automatic. Everything is going into deep slow motion, and Gary is aware that the Ruger spits a burst of nine shots before he can get his finger back off the trigger.

    There is no effect whatsoever. The attacker is still running at him, perhaps ten yards away and closing fast, reaching for knives at his belt with each hand. The assailant screams, "F*** you and your high powered rifle! I'm gonna kill you motherf***ers!"

    And Gary Fadden has run out of time. He lowers the Ruger, points it at the charging knifer, and pulls the trigger one more time. in the ethereal slow motion of profound tachypsychia, Gary can see the spent .223 shells arcing lazily out of the mechanism. He stops the burst, aware that six shots have been fired, as the man in front of him falls heavily to the ground.

    Gary moves quickly, putting a big brick planter between himself and the onrushing pickup as cover. The truck stops and the driver, the larger of the two bearded men, shrieks. "F*** you! You killed one of the brothers! You shot him, you motherf***er!" Gary's weapon is level and ready, but this time instead of waving the revolver, the man looks as if he's trying to hide it in the cab of his truck. Gary can see now that the third person in the truck, the one who has always stayed in the cab, is a woman.

    And then, the police are there. "They've got guns," Gary shouts to the officers disgorging from two patrol cars. He sets his rifle down and steps back as the officers swarm the pickup truck, taking the surviving man and woman into custody. In a moment, a cop is standing with Gary. "I did it," Gary says. The cop answers, "Did what?" "I shot that man." The officer picks up the AC556. "It's loaded," Gary warns, "Do you want me to unload it'?" The policeman answers. "No, I'll do it. Why don't you sit down?"

    Gary Fadden sits on the curb. For a moment, it seems as if the whole bizarre nightmare is over. Unfortunately, it has only begun.


    Aftermath

    The man he had shot. Billy "Too Loose" Hamilton, was dead. He had been hit by all six rounds of Winchester 55 grain FMJ, headstamped "'WCC81." One bullet had struck behind the lateral midline in the instant that he turned away from the gunfire, taking out a chunk of his spine as is skidded across his back from side to side. This would be interpreted later by the prosecutor as having been "shot in the back."

    The partner, who went by the name of "Papa Zoot," had gotten his weapons out of his hands by the time police arrived. In the front of the five-year-old Chevy pickup that had chased Fadden for more than 20 miles, police found a .22 auto pistol and a four-inch Smith & Wesson L-frame .357 Magnum. The revolver had three live and three empty cartridges in the cylinder. More fired brass was on the floor, and a plastic bag with more live ammo was open on the seat. Though Fadden heard no shots and no bullets hit his truck, he was convinced then and now that they were shooting at him during the chase.

    Hamilton's two knives, a Schrade folding hunter and a nondescript fixed blade, were found with his corpse.

    Gary Fadden was arrested that night and charged with 1st degree murder. His family raised $60,000 bail. He hired DC attorney Gerry Treanor to defend him. Treanor, at Gary's request, retained John Farnam and I as expert witnesses. Today, Gary remembers, "Two prosecutors wouldn't touch it until the third took it. It was all political because of the automatic weapon."

    The weeklong trial took place in October of 1984. Word had reached Gary that Papa Zoot had bought a .30/06 rifle and sworn a "blood oath" to kill him. I was driving toward Fairfax County when I got the message from Gary's lawyer that John and I wouldn't be needed because the prosecution had self-destructed.

    On the stand, Papa Zoot and the woman had testified that Gary had tried to run their biker brother off the road, and they had just followed 22 miles to get his license tag. Defense lawyer Treanor took them apart on cross-examination. An undercover detective broke his cover to testify that the deceased and Papa Zoot "put a bomb in my car, they like to rough people up." The prosecutor made such a show of waving the machine gun that the judge made a point of instructing the jury that the death weapon had nothing whatsoever to do with whether or not the shooting was self-defense. The jury learned that Gary purchased the AC-556 personally and that it was perfectly legal to possess the weapon.

    By the start of trial, the charge had been dropped to second-degree murder, and as the trial collapsed around the prosecutor's ears, he offered a plea to manslaughter, which Gary flatly rejected. At the end, when it was announced that the jury had found Gary Fadden Not Guilty on all counts, Fadden recalls that the self-same prosecutor snapped--in open court, in front of Gary's mother--"'You've let a murderer loose!"

    "'H&K protected me," says Gary. "They picked up the tab for about half of my legal bills, and got all the publicity for it, until I quit a few years later. Florian Deltgen (at that time CEO at HK) told me after an argument with the vice president that one or the other of us probably had to go, and the vice president wasn't going anywhere. I accepted a job offer from Beretta USA and then resigned from H&K. Deltgen stuck me with the remaining bill, which I paid off at 10% interest." The bill had amounted to more than $45,000. Gary was 34 years old before he had paid everything back.

    Dr. Deltgen is no longer with Heckler and Koch.


    Lessons

    Have communication. In 1984, only the rich had phones in their cars. Today, Gary Fadden is never without a charged-up cell phone. He knows that if he'd had one that day he could have called the police, who would have been able to interdict his pursuers before the thing became a killing situation.

    Flight can trigger pursuit. Prey that flees inflames the pursuit instinct of predators. This is why we teach our children never to run from snarling dogs. Gary Fadden did what society told him to do when facing criminals: he ran. They chased. By the time they caught up with him, Billy Hamilton was in such a rage to kill that he could not be deterred.

    Understand how deterrence really works. Papa Zoot and Too Loose had guns and ammo and knives in their truck with them. In Gary's truck were a Remington Nylon 66.22 rifle (for plinking, and never touched during the incident), a 9mm HK VP70Z pistol, and the AC556 with enough ammo for perhaps tour full magazines. None were loaded at the start. The pistol was loaded and placed in the console during the chase, and the rifle was at that point loaded and placed conspicuously on the dashboard by Gary in hopes that it would deter file pursuit. It did not.

    When Gary Fadden stepped out of his new Ford at the climax of the chase, most of us would have seen him as an intimidating presence. The man stands six feet eight and weighed 260 pounds at the time, and he was holding a machine gun. His pursuers were unimpressed.

    Later identified as belonging to one of the "big four" outlaw motorcycle clubs, Too Loose and Papa Zoot were members of an armed subculture themselves. They did not fear guns. Zoot was about 6'4" and 240 himself, and neither man feared big guys dressed like something off the cover of an L.L. Bean catalog. It is critical to understand this: Criminals don't fear guns. Criminals fear resolutely armed men or women they believe will actually shoot them.

    22 miles of running away from them had left these wolves convinced that they were dealing with a large sheep, not the sharp-fanged sheepdog Gary Fadden turned out to be. Testimony that "they liked to rough people up" shows that they had a lot of ego invested in brutalizing others. Perhaps Hamilton, in his last moment on earth, took Fadden's warning burst as an indication of unwillingness to shoot him. Toxicology screen after death showed Hamilton to have a .19% blood alcohol content. This is a level of intoxication consistent with inhibitions being at their lowest. Gary Fadden sums it up today, "The mouse had run, and the cat was loose. Physical size was no deterrent. The gun was no deterrent with these people. If you pull a gun, you'd better be ready to use it."

    Politically incorrect "assault weapons" make politically incorrect defendants. Though he didn't say it in so many words, prosecutor Jack Robbins' case against Fadden seemed to be, "I say, Muffy, people of breeding simply don't shoot criminals with machine guns in Fairfax County! Now, had he used a civilized weapon like a Browning Superposed ... and preferably shot him on the rise ... "

    You and I know that Class III holders are the ultimate "card carrying good guys and gals." That particular card says they have been investigated for six months by the Federal government and been found trustworthy to possess machine guns. Unfortunately, most of the public in the jury pool, and most politically motivated prosecutors, don't know that. Every self-defense shooting I've run across with a Class III weapon, however justified, has at the very least ended with the shooter facing a grand jury. Asked what he thinks would have happened if he'd shot Hamilton with a Remington 870 Wingmaster instead, Fadden replies with certainty, "I would have gone home that night. I've told dozens of people since, 'Do not use a Class III weapon for personal defense."' Today, the guns Gary is likely to have in his car have neutral images: an M-1 .30 carbine, and a 10mm Glock 20 pistol.

    Be there for your friends. It was stunning how many people he had trusted shunned Gary after the shooting, and particularly, after his indictment. He cherishes those who stood beside him through the ordeal, particularly Jim Stone and Rick DeMilt and, most particularly, knife-maker Al Mar.

    Much later, after his AC556 had been returned to him by the courts, Gary gave that gun to Al Mar, another man who appreciated a fine weapon of any kind. On its stock was a brass plate engraved "To Al Mar, Because You Understand."

    Gary says, "For twenty years now, I've cherished every morning I've gotten up, because I earned every moment of my life. I fought for it."

    After Al Mar's death, Gary Fadden scraped up the money to buy his knife business, and he is CEO of Al Mar Knives to this day. One good man carrying on the work of another. It seems fitting.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    ah yes this ones a classic.

    What about the gunstore guy who fended off burglars with a SW76, an M16, and IIRC a 1911?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    The Left Coast
    Posts
    1,450
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Great story, good lessons. Thank you.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,221
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    A few factors about the Fadden incident:

    1. It took place in the early 1980s when ARs were not the most commonly sold long arm in America, were not the most commonly carried long arm in police cars; it was a time when many police still carried revolvers, often loaded with non-hollowpoint ammo.

    2. The shooting was the result of an escalated road rage incident where the shooter was viewed as a participant, as opposed to a home invasion situation where the homeowner is viewed as a victim. There is an an archived article that detailed it in The Washington post which I can no longer access because it is behind a paywall. From that detailed account it seems that Fadden played more of a role in the verbal and on-road aggression than Ayoob described in the article. This is why some people have issues with Ayoob--it turns out that he sometimes exaggerates, embellishes, or leaves out key facts that make it more understandable why the person got in legal trouble.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    AZ-Waging jihad against crappy AR's.
    Posts
    24,900
    Feedback Score
    104 (100%)
    Agreed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ed L. View Post
    A few factors about the Fadden incident:

    1. It took place in the early 1980s when ARs were not the most commonly sold long arm in America, were not the most commonly carried long arm in police cars; it was a time when many police still carried revolvers, often loaded with non-hollowpoint ammo.

    2. The shooting was the result of an escalated road rage incident where the shooter was viewed as a participant, as opposed to a home invasion situation where the homeowner is viewed as a victim. There is an an archived article that detailed it in The Washington post which I can no longer access because it is behind a paywall. From that detailed account it seems that Fadden played more of a role in the verbal and on-road aggression than Ayoob described in the article. This is why some people have issues with Ayoob--it turns out that he sometimes exaggerates, embellishes, or leaves out key facts that make it more understandable why the person got in legal trouble.



    Owner/Instructor at Semper Paratus Arms

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SemperParatusArms/

    Semper Paratus Arms AR15 Armorer Course http://www.semperparatusarms.com/cou...-registration/

    M4C Misc. Training and Course Announcements- http://www.m4carbine.net/forumdisplay.php?f=141

    Master Armorer/R&D at SIONICS Weapon Systems- http://sionicsweaponsystems.com

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    666
    Feedback Score
    34 (100%)
    Very interesting story. Thanks for posting. Kinda want an Al Mar knife now....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,134
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Just spoke with Gary at the Al Mar booth at SHOT. He is very personable and humble man. Showed me his new design which he will bring to the Blade show.

    He is retired now but is still the chairman of the company.


    Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Not in a gun friendly state
    Posts
    3,809
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ed L. View Post
    This is why some people have issues with Ayoob--it turns out that he sometimes exaggerates, embellishes, or leaves out key facts that make it more understandable why the person got in legal trouble.
    Didn't Ayoob also once say that one should never use any weapon "designed" for personal defense (i.e. ARs, home defense shotguns, etc.) as a defensive weapon? I recall once hearing that having a weapon for defense strongly suggests that you have an aggressive streak and will be used as evidence that you probably provoked the situation. I can't remember if that was him, or just a running rumor in the gun community.
    Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who do not.-Ben Franklin

    there’s some good in this world, Mr. Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.-Samwise Gamgee

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    34,070
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringGuy45 View Post
    Didn't Ayoob also once say that one should never use any weapon "designed" for personal defense (i.e. ARs, home defense shotguns, etc.) as a defensive weapon? I recall once hearing that having a weapon for defense strongly suggests that you have an aggressive streak and will be used as evidence that you probably provoked the situation. I can't remember if that was him, or just a running rumor in the gun community.
    And that's probably my one criticism of Ayoob, in his desire to function in the capacity of "expert witness" I think he strayed into the "good guns vs bad guns" debate that prosecutors love and lost sight of the purpose of the second amendment.

    Granted there is some time and place and had Fadden employed a Remington 870 shotgun he probably wouldn't even have been charged, but it's one thing to recognize certain realities and another to endorse them. Thankfully today AR-15s and even SBRs are far more commonplace so it isn't as much a consideration as it might have been back in the 80s.

    It's unfortunate that we don't live in a world where a guy who has a clean enough background to own NFA weapons and has to defend himself from gang banger biker scum doesn't simply get an "atta boy" from responding officers.
    It's hard to be a ACLU hating, philosophically Libertarian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative, scientifically grounded, agnostic, porn admiring gun owner who believes in self determination.

    Chuck, we miss ya man.

    كافر

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    2,221
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringGuy45 View Post
    Didn't Ayoob also once say that one should never use any weapon "designed" for personal defense (i.e. ARs, home defense shotguns, etc.) as a defensive weapon? I recall once hearing that having a weapon for defense strongly suggests that you have an aggressive streak and will be used as evidence that you probably provoked the situation. I can't remember if that was him, or just a running rumor in the gun community.
    I don't think he ever said exactly that. A problem with Ayoob and his "looks bad in court" outlook is that many idiots on gun forums have taken this philosophy to absurd levels which Ayoob himself would never agree with. He did go overboard with some theoretical things--like he said the name Colt Trooper would sound less aggressive in court than the term Colt Python.

    Keep in mind that Ayoob originally started writing in the late 1970s and early 1980s. At that time most police officers were armed with revolvers and may not have even carried hollowpoints. He started teaching classes to the public in New Hampshire in the 1980s. Many of his students came from nearby states like NY, NJ, MA, which were not the most pro-gun places. At the time he started writing, the phrase "home invasion" was not in the dictionary.

    It's different today. Most police are armed with high capacity automatics loaded with hollowpoints, and often carry an AR-15 style "patrol rifle" in their car. High capacity handguns are the norm for civilians and the AR-15 is the most popular rifle in the US--with more companies manufacturing them than any other model of rifle.

    Also, compare the number of places that now have a castle doctrine and issue CCW permits to the time when Ayoob first advanced that argument.

    Looking at all of these factors, it is a whole different world.

    I can find lots of accounts of people who used ARs and Aks for home defense and never even wound up in court. The majority of home defense shootings where the gun is legal to own and was legally owned by the shooter do not end up in court. At the time he was writing a lot of this, the world was a much less gun friendly place.

    In a lot of the cases that Ayoob wrote about, the person who wound up in court had made several bad choices or even blunders to get there, or was the victim of really bad circumstances. Or they got caught in a situation where they had to shoot someone they knew--like a daughter's abusive boyfriend or husband. Often when someone has to shoot someone they knew there will be questions about whether they were a participant to an argument that escalated or an actual self defense shooting--unless there is some is some clear cut evidence like a kicked in door at their residence.

    I know he once wrote something along the lines that a 28" barreled shotgun with a normal magazine would look less menacing to a jury than a 18" barreled riot gun with a 5 or 6 shot magazine. But this was at a time when you would have to buy an extended magazine or an 18" for some shotguns because they did not come with them. Now you can walk into any gun store or even a big box sporting goods and find quite a few of them on the rack. I would always take an 18" barreled riot gun because it holds more rounds and the shorter barrel is more maneuverable and harder for a close in attacker to grab. He never actually advised anyone to choose a 28" barreled shotgun over an 18" barreled one with a higher magazine capacity.

    Also, when talking about things that might look bad in court, he was preparing people for possible objections that they might encounter for using more effective equipment. For example, when I took two course from him in 1987, he advocated hollowpoints and explained how to defend the use of them if the issue came up--they are less likely to overpenetrate and more likely to stop someone with less rounds being required to fire. That was in 1987. Now every police department uses them. So if things did go to court and the prosecution raised the issue it would be easy to point out that they are used by virtually every police department and why they are used.

    Some times he goes overboard on lawyer proofing. At one time, back when revolvers were more commonly carried, he was recommending that people have them modified to fire double-action only. That way if they shot someone in self defense an attorney could not accuse them of cocking the gun and having it accidentally go off. Think about this. In a situation where you are asserting that you shot someone in self defense Ayoob is worried that a lawyer is going to try to claim that your shooting was an accident and not self-defense as you claim.

    He based it on the Alvarez shooting, a situation in the early 1980s where a cop in Miami was holding someone at gunpoint and the person made a move toward a gun that they had concealed and the cop shot them in the head with his revolver. It wound up going to trial. Ayoob wrote articles about this and pointed out that an expert witness for the prosecution tried to claim that the officer had the revolver cocked when it wasn't. The expert witness said something along the lines of, "In my experience revolvers that are cocked go off more easily so I believe that the officer had the revolver cocked which was negligent.

    The reason that the other side was trying to establish negligence is because the defendant in this case, Miami Officer Luis Alvarez, initially claimed that the shooting was accidental, which was a key factor in this case which brought into focus questions about what type of modifications Alvarez might have done to his gun, or other factors that could lead to a negligent discharge.

    As I said in another thread, at one time he was cutting edge. He was very engaging and entertaining. Like him or hate him he really was a pioneer in bringing an emphasis to legalities and the legal aftermath to the firearms training world. He is not a bad person to take a class from, but there are many teachers who have far surpassed him in terms of teaching shooting skills and imparting street experience.
    Last edited by Ed L.; 01-24-19 at 04:59.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •