1.54 vs 1.93 optic height for Razor 1-6

[WS6]

Go 1.70"

[bjw182005]

I would love it if Geissele would offer a 1.75", but it wouldn't fit much of a market. I have used the 1.5" for some time, but may need the 1.93 for a newer work rifle as it will wear a PEQ15 full time. I don't think the standard mount will work well, and might even eliminate the lower 1/3 FOV due to the PEQ15.

[farmhard]

I went with a 1.93 mount for the reason that I wear glasses. Sometimes they slide down with out me noticing. With the 1.5 mounts from a cold shouldering I’d get a double dot with my px4i. The slightly more heads up position works better for me.

[SeriousStudent]

FightinQ - you need to dial back on the attitude. It is possible to discuss issues politely. Give it a try.

[SteveL]

Good to know! I was under the impression that the EXPS was closer to traditional lower1/3 height.

That's what I thought too.

I'm all about different solutions for different people, but as GTF's photos illustrate, its really not that big of a difference. Also, OP, I use the 1.93" with a Razor and don't have any need for an extended version.

I think a lot of it has to do with how you run your stock. You appear to have yours extended for a proper LOP and therefore don't need an extended scope mount. Guys who like to run their stocks collapsed all the way and NTCH always seem to be the ones who can't get their scope far enough forward.

Great looking setup by the way.

[Mrgunsngear]

Do you have the 1.54 extended or regular length ?