Pelosi, gun emergency..

[jsbhike]

I would just like point out, that 13th century, booger eating, goat raping tribesmen have kept the Soviet Union and the United States at bay with nothing more than small arms. Whether or not there is a large of number of people in this country willing to do that is another question.

The 13th century, booger eating, goat raping tribesmen don't feel any connection to, nor affinity for, outsiders such as Soviets or Americans.

There is an unfortunately uncommon trait among most people that actions they view as abhorrent when committed by a 3rd party aren't so bad(and they may even assist) when committed by someone they feel a connection to.

[Adrenaline_6]

The vast majority of hunters and firearms owners in generally have zero idea of what firearms ownership means in terms of the 2nd Amendment and any enlightenment typically repulses them.

While there are some .gov that wouldn't engage in confiscation, the harrassnent by LEO's against firearms owners completely in compliance with current laws doesn't seem to indicate there would be some vast mutiny when those same citizens are in violation.

And yet we still have the 2A. If it was that easy, it would already be a goner. The reason it isn't is that they don't think they can do it. The end.

This is a much lesser intrusion on the 2A in a liberal state and look how much non compliance there is already.
Attachment 55982

[Adrenaline_6]

I tend to agree your gun owning neighbors will be peaking out from behind closed drapes when the government employee scum arrive squad style to kill you because you didn't turn in the guns.I doubt any unionized government people will give up their pay and pensions when it comes time to confiscate the guns or lose their pay and pension.

Hmmm,.....pension and pay or high possibly of getting shot..as well as their family getting hurt as payback for deaths on the other side.

[Five_Point_Five_Six]

The wall does not infringe on anyone’s rights.

The people who own land that the wall will run through would probably disagree with you.

[Dist. Expert 26]

I tend to agree your gun owning neighbors will be peaking out from behind closed drapes when the government employee scum arrive squad style to kill you because you didn't turn in the guns.I doubt any unionized government people will give up their pay and pensions when it comes time to confiscate the guns or lose their pay and pension.

There's a reason that Afghan police wear masks to work and tend to turn up dead a lot. A local insurgency, where everyone knows where everyone else lives, isn't something to take lightly. How many local cops are gonna go to work wondering if their house will still be standing when they get home?

That's one hell of a Pandora's Box.

[Hmac]

Pelosi has stated, if trump can declare and emergency so can any Dem president in regards to guns...here we go..

Bah. If some future Democrat President declared a gun emergency, it would get struck down by some judge somewhere, just like Trump’s Wall Emergency is going to be.

[jsbhike]

There's a reason that Afghan police wear masks to work and tend to turn up dead a lot. A local insurgency, where everyone knows where everyone else lives, isn't something to take lightly. How many local cops are gonna go to work wondering if their house will still be standing when they get home?

That's one hell of a Pandora's Box.

The Afghan police are associated with Americans so that is a difference in here vs. there.

[jsbhike]

Bah. If some future Democrat President declared a gun emergency, it would get struck down by some judge somewhere, just like Trump’s Wall Emergency is going to be.

The wall might be, but as a general rule judges really hate the 2nd Amendment. Seems they did read the Federalist Papers.

[ABNAK]

I don't think Pelosi is plugged in enough to recognize just how close this country is to willful disobedience. In this case, one is a Constitutional protection (2nd Amendment), the other is a Constitutional requirement (defense of our nation). Please Fräulein Pelosi, suggest to the next Democrat POTUS that they should use the power of the executive office to nullify the Bill of Rights. Do it, and see what happens.

Yeah, disobedience to a pot law means some stoner defiantly burning a doobie to f**k The Man. Yeah dude!

Disobedience to a sweeping attempt to ban guns? Well...…... (hint: it ain't quite the same as that stoner "sticking it to The Man" with his doobie)





Always remember folks, freaking ALCOHOL was Constitutionally prohibited at one time. Think about that for a minute, let it sink in. Then mull over just how well that worked out.

[ABNAK]

It will definitely get blocked by the courts, regardless if he has the power or not.

How fast it gets to the SCOTUS will be the question.