Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: SCOTUS rules unanimously on asset seizure/excessive fines

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    5,400
    Feedback Score
    43 (100%)
    Long overdue, no one steals like the government.
    The simple fact of the matter is this, America has never not been great.
    - Mark Robinson

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    921
    Feedback Score
    70 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by docsherm View Post
    Exactly. I see that you are are thinking big picture...... NICE!
    Bet NJ Democrats are squirming. Not only did they make felons of magazine possessors but SCOTUS just asked them why they shouldn’t look at more of their current draconian laws.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    3,527
    Feedback Score
    0
    Should have to return the seized assets, à la bumpstocks.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    3,255
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yep, along with cash, vehicles etc.

    This could pretty much bankrupt some departments. Which is good, because they were no better than criminals themselves.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    NN, VA
    Posts
    2,177
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I see this as nothing but a win for the people. Yeah, it would be nice if old RGB would retire and call it a day, but this decision does not suck.
    "SEND IT" happens to be my trigger words...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    1,843
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Coal Dragger View Post
    Good ruling.

    Time to put many corrupt LEO agencies in their place.
    Politicians and government employees are a crime gang

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,054
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I'm always happy to see government theft being curbed.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,827
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by fledge View Post
    What’s the downside here? This puts gun/ammo taxes (and other “sin taxes”) and red flag laws on questionable ground.
    The issue is no DA/LE agency is going to interpret this ruling as meaning they have to stop seizing stuff.

    So it is business as usual.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,320
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    The issue is no DA/LE agency is going to interpret this ruling as meaning they have to stop seizing stuff.

    So it is business as usual.
    I have a feeling that a majority of seizure cases are going to be upheld until there is more precedent from the Circuit Courts. They could've mitigated that somewhat by saying that the seizure of the Land Rover in this case was excessive, but they punted.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    2,054
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    The issue is no DA/LE agency is going to interpret this ruling as meaning they have to stop seizing stuff.

    So it is business as usual.
    Yes, they'll keep stealing stuff from people. But when those people take those PDs to court they have a much better chance of winning.

    Eventually PDs will learn its not worth their time to try to steal from people as the court will give it back.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •