Benchmade anti gun?

[NWPilgrim]

That is a good response. It is bothersome that companies that are pro 2A still justify funding politicians hell bent against 2A in order to get defense contracts. As much as I want our troops to have the very best equipment, not at the cost of propping up those working hard to take away the very rights our DoD is supposed to be defending.

Hopefully Surefire found this to be futile and will not restart the PAC except for politicians that will support both our troops and 2A. Very good statement by the founder.

[AndyLate]

So in the name of pragmatism, we gave money to people that want to disarm us and do other bad things. I guess they had to play the game to help the "warfighters". I just hope that doing it for the warfighters wasn't the equivalent of "for the children".

I find the honestly refreshing and respect it. I will spend my money on Surefire instead of Benchmade.

Andy

[TomMcC]

Honesty in such matters is always good of course, but fidelity to good foundational principles seems better IMO. Pragmatism is great when I'm working on my car or building a bridge, but it can get you into trouble when it comes to abstractions like "rights".

[jsbhike]

Honesty in such matters is always good of course, but fidelity to good foundational principles seems better IMO. Pragmatism is great when I'm working on my car or building a bridge, but it can get you into trouble when it comes to abstractions like "rights".

Yeah reading The Federalist Papers and other founding documents on the 2nd Amendment versus their response and history indicates, at best and giving them the benefit of the doubt, they have no idea what the 2nd Anendment is about.