The Fake Native American Now Wants Reparations for Slavery

[SteyrAUG]

Scalia and Thomas are anomalies.

Ron Paul was another example. Take him and John McCain and line up Republican congressmen behind which ever matches their positions (based on voting and stumping) most closely.

Pretty sure the McCain line will be much larger so who is actually the RINO?

If you are saying the GOP got occupied by RINO's, I agree.

If you are saying it's been that way for a long time, I agree.

But I think the word "Republican" is supposed to mean something. Of course if we used words correctly, most of us are "liberals", I'm fairly liberal when it comes to guns, pretty much anyone who is not a seriously prohibited person should be able to get one.

I'm fairly liberal about all of our civil rights, the first ten amendments. If I was ever President, people would have more personal freedom than they could probably responsibly manage. And we'd just have to figure out how to address that problem without limiting personal freedoms of people who haven't done anything wrong yet.

The only thing I'm not liberal about, is funding things. It would be a "live how you want to live, but we ain't paying for your shit" kind of country.

[Diamondback]

If you are saying the GOP got occupied by RINO's, I agree.

If you are saying it's been that way for a long time, I agree.

But I think the word "Republican" is supposed to mean something. Of course if we used words correctly, most of us are "liberals", I'm fairly liberal when it comes to guns, pretty much anyone who is not a seriously prohibited person should be able to get one.

I'm fairly liberal about all of our civil rights, the first ten amendments. If I was ever President, people would have more personal freedom than they could probably responsibly manage. And we'd just have to figure out how to address that problem without limiting personal freedoms of people who haven't done anything wrong yet.

The only thing I'm not liberal about, is funding things. It would be a "live how you want to live, but we ain't paying for your shit" kind of country.

This is the difference between a Classical Liberal (more commonly identified as libertarian) today and the ProgComFascist Axis of Radical Leftism. Michael Savage nicely documented how the splintered offshoots of Marx and Wilson came back together to form the New Left in his Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder. Dude's whacked half the time, but when he hits he belts it out of the ballpark...

[jsbhike]

If you are saying the GOP got occupied by RINO's, I agree.

If you are saying it's been that way for a long time, I agree.

But I think the word "Republican" is supposed to mean something. Of course if we used words correctly, most of us are "liberals", I'm fairly liberal when it comes to guns, pretty much anyone who is not a seriously prohibited person should be able to get one.

I'm fairly liberal about all of our civil rights, the first ten amendments. If I was ever President, people would have more personal freedom than they could probably responsibly manage. And we'd just have to figure out how to address that problem without limiting personal freedoms of people who haven't done anything wrong yet.

The only thing I'm not liberal about, is funding things. It would be a "live how you want to live, but we ain't paying for your shit" kind of country.

Not sure if got occupied and long time quite do it justice considering a lot of 48'ers (Marxists) escaping Europe ended up in the US and in the GOP.

Spot on about classical liberals. We would have remained under British rule had it been left to conservatives of the day.

[jsbhike]

Scalia and Thomas are anomalies.

Ron Paul was another example. Take him and John McCain and line up Republican congressmen behind which ever matches their positions (based on voting and stumping) most closely.

Pretty sure the McCain line will be much larger so who is actually the RINO?

Didn't hit 2016 right, but does have the in theory vs. in practice lines closer together.

https://www.conservativedailynews.co...t-libertarian/