Registration equals confiscation ... don’t ever doubt it for a minute.

[prepare]

So the local LE was dispatched to the Parkland crazy residents 26 times and supposedly they couldn’t do anything. If we had red flag laws in place the guy becomes a official known crazy based on his history of behavior and speech and cannot but guns leagally. Red flagging mental cases becomes a bureaucratic process with certain behavior and speech profiles. Then somebody says something that a mental case said, it’s taken out of context and next thing you know they’re red flagged. Government likes blanket policy because of all the fairness crap. Red flag laws are another step down the slippery slope.

[Todd.K]

While there are interesting points about how compatible the ERPO can be with our current due process understanding, I feel we have skipped over common sense. And ridicule.

Common sense holds that someone who is an "Extreme Risk" with a firearm is also an extreme risk to the public without one. Following this logic the purpose is virtue signaling, ignorance, or the common anti-gun strategy of claiming firearms cause violence.

I suggest that extreme risk persons should have to move in to Rubio's neighborhood. And anyone else who thinks it's a good idea. Please tell me how much you would like to live next to these people, share the road with them, or maybe teach your kids.

[prepare]

While there are interesting points about how compatible the ERPO can be with our current due process understanding, I feel we have skipped over common sense. And ridicule.

Common sense holds that someone who is an "Extreme Risk" with a firearm is also an extreme risk to the public without one. Following this logic the purpose is virtue signaling, ignorance, or the common anti-gun strategy of claiming firearms cause violence.

I suggest that extreme risk persons should have to move in to Rubio's neighborhood. And anyone else who thinks it's a good idea. Please tell me how much you would like to live next to these people, share the road with them, or maybe teach your kids.

Good post!

[Joelski]

Re-open/re-build state mental institutions and put the crazy people in there. You can also send non-violent addicts in for the year-long inpatient rehabilitation program it takes to reduce failure to below 50%. People with serious mental illness and non-compliance belong in supervised custodial care, not on the streets, bouncing between hospitals and jails because nobody knows what to do with them and they don't want to get sued for doing nothing, even if it's wrong.

Use the welfare money to fund the institutions - all of the above are sure to be on the dole.

Schizophrenic, unstable paraniods and violent sociopaths are not people you want your wife and kids to meet.

[Stickman]

Re-open/re-build state mental institutions and put the crazy people in there. You can also send non-violent addicts in for the year-long inpatient rehabilitation program it takes to reduce failure to below 50%. People with serious mental illness and non-compliance belong in supervised custodial care, not on the streets, bouncing between hospitals and jails because nobody knows what to do with them and they don't want to get sued for doing nothing, even if it's wrong.

Use the welfare money to fund the institutions - all of the above are sure to be on the dole.

Schizophrenic, unstable paraniods and violent sociopaths are not people you want your wife and kids to meet.

I agree, but neither are tweakers / meth maggots, and plenty of people are more at risk from them than they are from the mentally ill, or from people who could fall into a "risk" category because of words take the wrong way or a guy being pissed off at the world for a while.

[tgizzard]

the fact that some ghetto goblin breeds with anyone she can and pops out felons like a Pez dispenser has no bearing on my constitutional rights.

Haha, this is one of the funniest things I’ve read in a while. I think the seriousness of the convo overshadowed that gem of a comment. Thank you Stick, I’ll be using this term going forward.

Also, thread consistency. Shall not infringe means just that. Someone inform our “overloads”, please.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Diamondback]

Haha, this is one of the funniest things I’ve read in a while. I think the seriousness of the convo overshadowed that gem of a comment. Thank you Stick, I’ll be using this term going forward.

It also suggests a variation on the theme, "walking Felon-flavored Pez dispenser." You know, just the kind who Ocrazio-Crackwhore will want for her personal Sturmtruppen...

[Diamondback]

Moving onto the catch phrase of Domestic Violence, I will guess the majority of you have no idea what it encompasses. Do you know that it covers your exwife you divorced 20 years ago? Yup, she is as much a part of DV as your current wife is. Under the laws of plenty of states, DV includes room mates, which means if you slap a room mate on the back from 20 years ago and ask him where your money is that he stole when he ran off and left you paying all the rent, you are guilty of DV. Do you know that if you fought with, made threats, or similar activities your siblings, you are guilty of DV?

Stick, would you mind if I used your post #22 (with credit) as part of my next piece for Redstate? We have a bunch of Rubio/Graham-humping ERPO-fetishists over there despite it being a "pro-gun, Conservative" site and I think you have the PERFECT smackdown for them here.

[Stickman]

Stick, would you mind if I used your post #22 (with credit) as part of my next piece for Redstate? We have a bunch of Rubio/Graham-humping ERPO-fetishists over there despite it being a "pro-gun, Conservative" site and I think you have the PERFECT smackdown for them here.

Feel free to.

[The_War_Wagon]

That's the only reason keeping me from filing to SBR one of my lowers.

Ditto. I've yet to see an AR pistol I really like, but I'll go that route, BEFORE SBR.