Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 116

Thread: New Beretta 92X: Steel w/ frame mounted safety

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    DEEP SOUTH
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    No threaded barrel?

    And I’d be more interested if Beretta hadn’t screwed me out of a factory rebate. Causing me to swear off new Beretta products.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    884
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post
    Anyone found an MSRP yet?
    Couple people on the Beretta forum are saying MSRP of 1399. But, I've not seen anything official.

    They'd better come close to the CZs and 226 Legion or they're going to lose out for sure.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7,131
    Feedback Score
    26 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SeriousStudent View Post

    Of course, I can always buy Greg Bell's after he switches back to his CZ.....
    Nooo, I got dibs ... I already offered him $200 ... I might even throw in a chickfilet sammich.


    Riots are like sports, it's better to watch it on TV at home.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    717
    Feedback Score
    61 (100%)
    Any idea if this can be carried with hammer cocked and safety engaged? Does the safety de-cock the gun?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,098
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Esq. View Post
    It's sad the state of American manhood. Alvin York weighed 170 pounds and never bitched or whined about carrying an all steel pistol, I hear it worked fairly well too.....
    Maybe he did?

    A 1911a1 with 7 rds might be lighter than a Beretta 92x with 19 rds.

    But really, a lighter gun just handles faster than a heavier one. No?
    Last edited by Ron3; 03-09-19 at 14:55.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    258
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ron3 View Post
    Maybe he did?

    A 1911a1 with 7 rds might be lighter than a Beretta 92x with 19 rds.

    But really, a lighter gun just handles faster than a heavier one. No?
    If you think this pistol is too heavy you have missed the point of it completely.

    The 92X is designed for one thing and one thing only: compete with CZ's Shadow 2 in IPSC and USPSA Production. Light weight is not an asset.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Black Hills of S.D.
    Posts
    1,701
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    How very interesting, now if they would just make it in baby shit brown.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    11,469
    Feedback Score
    46 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Sam View Post
    Nooo, I got dibs ... I already offered him $200 ... I might even throw in a chickfilet sammich.
    I'll throw in extra waffle fries and a extra box of nuggets. Plus a gallon of sweet tea to take home.

    If I can snag one out the door for around 1250, I might just do it.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    13,549
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    ......I accept this. I am bypassing the m9a3. Just make it in black

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Miami
    Posts
    1,005
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Firefly View Post
    ......I accept this. I am bypassing the m9a3. Just make it in black
    I actually laughed at that. I’m a fan of the slim grip style of the Vertec guns and the M9A3 was one I’ve been looking at for years but never got one especially at the current prices.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •