Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 57

Thread: China and Russia Defeat the US says...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    7,287
    Feedback Score
    87 (100%)
    Also, I hope it wouldn’t take long to catch up, but right now our Law of Armed Conflict does not support a successful ending to a war with either.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Black Hills, South Dakota
    Posts
    3,255
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BoringGuy45 View Post
    Neither have the subs, carriers, or naval aircraft we have though.
    Well aircraft carriers are obsolete and stupid, just huge targets for anti-ship missiles that cost relatively little. They’re also extremely noisy and easy to detect by submarines. The Chinese don’t need a deep water Navy or the best submarines to keep US carrier groups so far out that the airplanes they carry are not combat effective. Unfortunately US Navy brass consist of lot’s of aviators that refuse to accept this reality. So we spend more money on antiques. Carriers are really good for flexing on 3rd world opponents with no anti-ship capability, I have doubts they’re relevant for projecting power ashore against a peer or near peer opponent.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,086
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    I wonder what strategy they would take in defeating us?
    Turn off the wi fi!
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com


    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,086
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Also, I hope it wouldn’t take long to catch up, but right now our Law of Armed Conflict does not support a successful ending to a war with either.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    "I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve"
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com


    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    9,767
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    Is our fleet even operating anywhere near an effective level?
    I don't think so, look at the issues that were brought to light as a result of the McCain and Fitzgerald incidents.

    Plus, they are talking about retiring the USS Truman (CVN-75) early instead of refueling her reactor in 2024. This would essentially cut 20 years of the Truman's service life.

    The Navy has to worry about keeping two shipyards in particular in business: Newport News, which is reported to be the only shipyard in the world capable of building a nuclear powered carrier, and Electric Boat in Groton, Connecticut, which is the largest builder of nuclear subs.

    In other news, the Pentagon is wanting to order a bunch of F-15x's, the Air Force may not be so anxious to get the new 'old' fighters: https://taskandpurpose.com/air-force-f15x-purchase-f35
    Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the President... - Theodore Roosevelt, Lincoln and Free Speech, Metropolitan Magazine, Volume 47, Number 6, May 1918.

    Every Communist must grasp the truth. Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. Our principle is that the Party commands the gun, and the gun must never be allowed to command the Party Mao Zedong, 6 November, 1938 - speech to the Communist Patry of China's sixth Central Committee

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    8,525
    Feedback Score
    0
    Never invade China. Never invade Russia. If they were wise they would never even attempt to invade us. Invading is one thing; hitting targets like airfields (with conventional munitions) cannot be ruled out and should therefore be planned for accordingly. This goes both ways of course.

    Outside of those parameters it would be a [hopefully] limited encounter, however bloody it may be, that would take place near "flash points". Unfortunately for us, those very "flash points" (SE Europe, the ME, SW Asia, the Far East) are all much closer to potential enemies than they are to us. Of course then the need in those situations to hit airfields in China/Russia proper becomes more likely, more pronounced. We are still thousands of miles away.

    The inherent danger of the above strategy is that China/Russia, pissed that they've been hit on home soil, would be determined to hit us here some how, some way. THAT would have the potential of ramping the conflict up significantly.

    Basically we would see such a conflict in a more tactical sense, while they would see it in a more strategic way.
    11C2P '83-'87
    Airborne Infantry

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    4,055
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Admiral: We need a report.

    Rand: Mo’ money?

    Admiral: My man!

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    13,142
    Feedback Score
    0
    Outside of a coordinated attack in multiple theaters, the problem with 'defeating' the US is that since the US has 3-4 times the military power that any enemy faces at one time, you then get to do it again- and maybe a couple more times- all while you are an international pariah, whose neighbors are all more then happy to see you taken down a notch or two. And you are fighting a war in your economic zone..

    In fact, I'd bet that you'd be able to get a sucker punch in on the US and the US would take time and rally economic and political pressure, while they wind up the wheelhouse hit.

    People don't realize how inherently unstable China is. It looks like a fine watch that just keeps ticking, but it has a bunch of springs that will screw everything up if knocked out of alignment.

    Russia's play will always be a softer play with the destabilizing the Baltic countries internally before they go in to 'safeguard' their Russian minorities. Russia is just waiting for the West to screw itself financially with debt and socialism, and then pick up scraps- kind of an odd turn-about on the 90s.
    I just did two lines of powdered wig powder, cranked up some Lee Greenwood, and recited the BoR. - Outlander Systems

    I'm a professional WAGer - WillBrink /// "Comey is a smarmy, self righteous mix of J. Edgar Hoover and a gay Lurch from the "Adams Family"." -Averageman

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    7,287
    Feedback Score
    87 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 26 Inf View Post
    I don't think so, look at the issues that were brought to light as a result of the McCain and Fitzgerald incidents.

    Plus, they are talking about retiring the USS Truman (CVN-75) early instead of refueling her reactor in 2024. This would essentially cut 20 years of the Truman's service life.

    The Navy has to worry about keeping two shipyards in particular in business: Newport News, which is reported to be the only shipyard in the world capable of building a nuclear powered carrier, and Electric Boat in Groton, Connecticut, which is the largest builder of nuclear subs.
    Good points. I’m actually doing a small report on all of this stuff right now and the industrial base is a huge concern. Same with the training issue, apparently an entire command was just setup to validate ship crews before they go on deployment (or something to that effect) because of those events.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    10,516
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Wake27 View Post
    Good points. I’m actually doing a small report on all of this stuff right now and the industrial base is a huge concern. Same with the training issue, apparently an entire command was just setup to validate ship crews before they go on deployment (or something to that effect) because of those events.
    I joined the Army in 1981, that testing was a regular part of our daily lives along with annual MOS testing, Individual skills testing and the continual threat of some folks from Corps walking in unannounced and auditing training, equipment status and property accountability. You were actually required to have your individual skills booklet in your pocket at all times to track your training.
    I guess a lot of things have went to the wayside in order to make the Military a little easier for people to serve in, but it's kind of hard to justify that to a corpse isn't it?

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •