Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: Remington can be sued over Sandy Hook......

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KCMH
    Posts
    2,791
    Feedback Score
    0

    Remington can be sued over Sandy Hook......

    Well? It’s only Connecticut at this time but does this potentially open the Pandora’s box??

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,827
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Box has been open for awhile. Most shootings result in lawsuits, most are tossed via PLCAA. I think one was successful as the shop was gross negligent as law allowed.

    This will go back to Federal Court where it will be tossed, since there is zip negligence. For example this quote:

    "Nicole Hockley said Remington and other gunmakers need to stop gearing their advertising toward troubled young men."

    Well keep in mind Adam Lanza did not buy the weapon, he stole it from his mother whom he murdered. So how exactly are they going to show Remington marketed the gun to a killer when it was actually bought by his law-abiding mother?
    Last edited by Renegade; 03-14-19 at 14:38.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    KCMH
    Posts
    2,791
    Feedback Score
    0
    One more log on the fire I suppose. Very true, Lanza didn’t buy the weapon, it was stolen.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    27,205
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    I still think that idiot mother of his could have/should have kept weapons from this little piece of crap. She knew he was a nutjob.
    "You people have too much time on your hands." - scottryan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    SE Idaho
    Posts
    1,585
    Feedback Score
    34 (100%)
    Renegade has it right. Indeed God rest her soul but his mother was the problem. If she had admitted how troubled he was (to herself) then this tragedy would never have happened.

    Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
    "It is better to be a Warrior in a Garden than a Gardner in a War"
    Let's use the First Amendment to protect the Second so we can avoid using the Second to protect the First.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,086
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    I'm confused. I had thought this BS had been attempted many times and put to rest by SCOTUS a while ago no?
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com


    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Just another filthy undesirable civilian "basement dweller"
    Posts
    4,387
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    I'm confused. I had thought this BS had been attempted many times and put to rest by SCOTUS a while ago no?
    To the Left it's only "settled law" when it's settled THEIR way. Anything else is open to re-litigation at any time...
    You really have to ask why Conservatives have guns? Because Liberals block freeways, burn cities, throw Molotov cocktails, loot, turn over cop cars, and think this behavior is Socially Acceptable.
    --unknown, memed by user "KeepnitReel" at Northwest Firearms
    Joe Biden is not, nor will he EVER be, my President. #SauceForGooseSauceForGander

    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,086
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    To the Left it's only "settled law" when it's settled THEIR way. Anything else is open to re-litigation at any time...
    If SCOTUS considers it settled law, where does that leave them? Unless they have an angle they can convince SCOTUS to take it up (doubtful is my guess) this seems more political statement of some kind. It is CT, and they really don't give a damn about the Const.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com


    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Just another filthy undesirable civilian "basement dweller"
    Posts
    4,387
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    If SCOTUS considers it settled law, where does that leave them? Unless they have an angle they can convince SCOTUS to take it up (doubtful is my guess) this seems more political statement of some kind. It is CT, and they really don't give a damn about the Const.
    That's only Settled Law until they can get another Leftist justice or two whether by hook (Nom/Confirm in their next administration) or by crook (encouraging Roberts and Kavanaugh's inner Earl Warren and David Souter). These people are totally convinced of the inevitability of their cause and are willing to slog through as much of a Long March as it takes--and I don't think we all really know how close they came to Finishing the Job on a century-plus of work in 2016.

    I know these people, I grew up among them, was educated among their children and was being groomed from an early age to JOIN them.
    You really have to ask why Conservatives have guns? Because Liberals block freeways, burn cities, throw Molotov cocktails, loot, turn over cop cars, and think this behavior is Socially Acceptable.
    --unknown, memed by user "KeepnitReel" at Northwest Firearms
    Joe Biden is not, nor will he EVER be, my President. #SauceForGooseSauceForGander

    LIFE MEMBER - NRA & SAF Not employed or sponsored by any manufacturer, distributor or retailer.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Lowcountry, SC.
    Posts
    2,930
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Diamondback View Post
    To the Left it's only "settled law" when it's settled THEIR way. Anything else is open to re-litigation at any time...
    I think that’s pretty much the defining nature of liberalism/progressiveism.
    RLTW
    “Your posts will be more accurate and received much better if you form your opinions with less emotion and more objectivity and then express them as if you’re in a discussion with friends, rather than an injured and cornered animal fighting for its life.” -Revolution 9 on the hide

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •