Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 41 to 49 of 49

Thread: US Army Selects B&T

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    4,058
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'm looking forward to the TP-380

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    9,529
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Gettin' down innagrass.
    Let's Go Brandon!

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Posts
    2,048
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Can anyone expound on the pros/cons of the APC vs the GHM series of guns from B&T?

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    4,420
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RAM Engineer View Post
    Can anyone expound on the pros/cons of the APC vs the GHM series of guns from B&T?
    APC 9 Pro:
    - non reciprocating ambidextrous cocking handles
    - updated lower that uses removable AR15 pistol grip
    - updated bolt release location/controls in lower
    - bolt is machined to allow use of Glock mag and SigSauer USA 320/m17 mag lowers
    SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Posts
    2,048
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    APC 9 Pro:
    - non reciprocating ambidextrous cocking handles
    - updated lower that uses removable AR15 pistol grip
    - updated bolt release location/controls in lower
    - bolt is machined to allow use of Glock mag and SigSauer USA 320/m17 mag lowers
    I think the GHM9 Pro incorporates 2 and 4 above as well. Not sure about 1 or 3.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    4,420
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by RAM Engineer View Post
    I think the GHM9 Pro incorporates 2 and 4 above as well. Not sure about 1 or 3.
    At present there are no plans for a GHM Pro. The gen 2 GHM will work with the Pro lower, to include the Glock and 320 mag lowers, but there are no plans to offer the Pro lower as standard on the GHM at present. Could this change in the future? Sure. At present one would need to purchase the Pro lower as an accessory to use on the GHM.
    SLG Defense 07/02 FFL/SOT

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    N. Alabama
    Posts
    2,048
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoshNC View Post
    At present there are no plans for a GHM Pro. The gen 2 GHM will work with the Pro lower, to include the Glock and 320 mag lowers, but there are no plans to offer the Pro lower as standard on the GHM at present. Could this change in the future? Sure. At present one would need to purchase the Pro lower as an accessory to use on the GHM.
    Ah, I see the distinction now. I guess for me the point is moot, because with a Pro lower and Glock magazines, that would only get me 4 parts (grip, mag body, mag follower, mag floorplate) for 922r to SBR one. Not sure of any other 922r parts availability for the B&T guns, so I'm back to my original plan of SBR-ing a Scorpion Evo 3...

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    OUTPOST 31
    Posts
    10,518
    Feedback Score
    30 (100%)
    NOBODY cares about 922r guys

    Seriously.





    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    176
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by jpmuscle View Post
    NOBODY cares about 922r guys

    Seriously.
    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    This x 1000

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •