Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Sen. Harry Reid gets injured...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    This was beyond frivolously brought into he court room, and I would guess it was his position of power that had him thinking it would fly.

    To refuse to even show the most basic of evidence is a slap in the face to the court, the jury, and all involved. I hope the company goes back after him and his estate.
    It also suggests it really is a cover for what actually happened. Can't show the evidence because that would be perjury.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    1,990
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stickman View Post
    This was beyond frivolously brought into he court room, and I would guess it was his position of power that had him thinking it would fly.

    To refuse to even show the most basic of evidence is a slap in the face to the court, the jury, and all involved. I hope the company goes back after him and his estate.
    I thought judges had the power to not allow a case to go to trial if there was no evidence or corroborating witnesses? Why did this even get to court?
    It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! ... Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" - Patrick Henry in an address at St. John’s Church, Richmond, Virginia, on March 23, 1775.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    377
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NWPilgrim View Post
    I thought judges had the power to not allow a case to go to trial if there was no evidence or corroborating witnesses? Why did this even get to court?
    Because, if the judge dismisses the case on a motion to strike, it is appealed. The court of appeals reviews whether the judge correctly selected the law, whether the facts were sufficient, whether a reasonable jurist could have come to a different conclusion, etc., etc. The case gets remanded to further hearing/retrial after the court of appeals highlights the judge's mistakes in their appellate opinion.

    If the judge lets it go to trial, the jury says "no." Nothing to appeal.

    Plus, if you are judge that has some legislative confirmation to undergo to be reappointed, do you really want to mess with legislators who know people who know people that could block your reappointment?

    Path of least resistance.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,884
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    It also suggests it really is a cover for what actually happened. Can't show the evidence because that would be perjury.
    sure when they are done with the hillary they will get to obama then harry ! ya know priorities and all

    but wont be holding my breath that is for sure reckon or hope my kids can say to their grand kids YUP they really went after one for years about Russia with no proof but they never ever did anything to the real criminals and this is why we live in such a screwed up society today ! your great grandpa had stories before the shut down of what freedom was like ! I only got to live with it for a short while

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •