Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 37

Thread: The Mysterious Disappearance & Death of Two Dutch Hiker Girls

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,898
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by austinN4 View Post
    I have been to Boquete and would not have thought it unsafe, but that was some time ago and things change. For that matter, things can go to hell pretty quick just about anywhere.
    It's not unsafe, hence my comments. It's a very safe area in a generally safe country. But, chit can happen anyplace. I lived in the safest city in the US at the time (Newton MA) and i missed the owner of the fish store I liked to visit regularly get shot by about 30 mins. Missed a bank robbery by maybe 45.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Always in the mountains.
    Posts
    668
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Appears to be a hiking accident to me. The jungle is a very harsh place that lulls outsiders into a sense of complacency with it’s beauty. There are oddities, but I think they’re overall minor when taken into the bigger picture of amateur hikers in unknown back country. Here is the biggest question. Why the photos at night? The simple explanaition is that by this point, having only a day pack, the surviving girl is delrious. Still, why at night and why only that night? Maybe this was taken shortly after one of the girls suffered a fatal fall and the other was taking note of the location? But why at night? Were they attempting to move at night? If so, this shows their lack of experience in the jungle and may be why one was killed. Again, though, why not wait until morning?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    5,117
    Feedback Score
    7 (100%)
    I was fascinated by this case like millions of other Americans, and the photos were at least leaked as I've seen dozens, and dozens of them. They were using the flash as a light at some point, and another picture looks to be of a fallen girl.

    I came to the conclusion that is was an accidental if foolhardy incident.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    Posts
    4,719
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Doc,

    With the evidence presented in the video, it is difficult for me to conclude anything other than death by misadventure. What is making you determine otherwise?

    b_c

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    It's not unsafe, hence my comments. It's a very safe area in a generally safe country. But, chit can happen anyplace. I lived in the safest city in the US at the time (Newton MA) and i missed the owner of the fish store I liked to visit regularly get shot by about 30 mins. Missed a bank robbery by maybe 45.
    What I find interesting from the standpoint of whether or not there was foul play: There were $83 in the backpack. I assume they must have been US dollars since that's pretty much an international form of currency. Dutch money would have been worthless in Panama. So if it were Panamanian or US dollars surely a perp would have kept the cash, traded the cell phones and the camera for drugs or cigarettes or something. I think this leans strongly toward the "accident" theory.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Business_Casual View Post
    Doc,

    With the evidence presented in the video, it is difficult for me to conclude anything other than death by misadventure. What is making you determine otherwise?

    b_c
    I agree: It was two inexperienced hikers who had no business being where they were.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyohte View Post
    Appears to be a hiking accident to me. The jungle is a very harsh place that lulls outsiders into a sense of complacency with it’s beauty. There are oddities, but I think they’re overall minor when taken into the bigger picture of amateur hikers in unknown back country. Here is the biggest question. Why the photos at night? The simple explanaition is that by this point, having only a day pack, the surviving girl is delrious. Still, why at night and why only that night? Maybe this was taken shortly after one of the girls suffered a fatal fall and the other was taking note of the location? But why at night? Were they attempting to move at night? If so, this shows their lack of experience in the jungle and may be why one was killed. Again, though, why not wait until morning?
    Here's what I think happened. The first photo in the sequence is the one of the twig with the plastic bags on it. I don't know why that was taken at night unless the two were starving, thirsty, and not thinking clearly. They were doing their best to conserve energy by moving around at night instead of the daytime in the hot, steamy jungle.

    I think shortly after that, in the pitch black darkness, Lisanne heard Kris scream because Kris had fallen over the edge of a precipice. Lisanne began frantically snapping photos to use the camera's flash to try to locate where her friend was. The next photo in sequence is the one looking over the precipice where there may be the faint image of a "body" in the upper right hand portion of the photo. I think that's when Lisanne had found Kris at the bottom of a ravine. The next photo in sequence is the bloody head shot of Kris. Lisanne had crawled down the precipice to where Kris's body was, and snapped the photo to document her friend's death. I think somewhere in the darkness Lisanne probably suffered a fatal fall shortly afterword. The two bodies laid there until the torrential rains flooded the area and carried the bodies off. If both bodies had multiple broken bones, as they decomposed they probably would have disarticulated faster than a body that was decomposing without broken bones. Who knows how long the remains were in the river before animals carried off what was left. I do believe the skulls should have been found, though.

    Anyway, that's my theory.


    I've looked at a gazillion websites concerning this case. If anyone can provide a link to the "unreleased" photos that would be great.
    Last edited by Doc Safari; 04-12-19 at 09:17.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    21,898
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    What I find interesting from the standpoint of whether or not there was foul play: There were $83 in the backpack. I assume they must have been US dollars since that's pretty much an international form of currency. Dutch money would have been worthless in Panama. So if it were Panamanian or US dollars surely a perp would have kept the cash, traded the cell phones and the camera for drugs or cigarettes or something. I think this leans strongly toward the "accident" theory.
    Panama uses the US dollar and Dutch money could simply be exchanged for US dollars. If someone looking to do bad things to them, and kill them, probably robbery as the motive. I assume plenty of killers don't rob their victims if robbery was not the motive. I don't find that telling at all in terms of accident vs foul play.
    - Will

    General Performance/Fitness Advice for all

    www.BrinkZone.com

    LE/Mil specific info:

    https://brinkzone.com/category/swatleomilitary/

    “Those who do not view armed self defense as a basic human right, ignore the mass graves of those who died on their knees at the hands of tyrants.”

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Always in the mountains.
    Posts
    668
    Feedback Score
    4 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Doc Safari View Post
    Here's what I think happened. The first photo in the sequence is the one of the twig with the plastic bags on it. I don't know why that was taken at night unless the two were starving, thirsty, and not thinking clearly. They were doing their best to conserve energy by moving around at night instead of the daytime in the hot, steamy jungle.

    I think shortly after that, in the pitch black darkness, Lisanne heard Kris scream because Kris had fallen over the edge of a precipice. Lisanne began frantically snapping photos to use the camera's flash to try to locate where her friend was. The next photo in sequence is the one looking over the precipice where there may be the faint image of a "body" in the upper right hand portion of the photo. I think that's when Lisanne had found Kris at the bottom of a ravine. The next photo in sequence is the bloody head shot of Kris. Lisanne had crawled down the precipice to where Kris's body was, and snapped the photo to document her friend's death. I think somewhere in the darkness Lisanne probably suffered a fatal fall shortly afterword. The two bodies laid there until the torrential rains flooded the area and carried the bodies off. If both bodies had multiple broken bones, as they decomposed they probably would have disarticulated faster than a body that was decomposing without broken bones. Who knows how long the remains were in the river before animals carried off what was left. I do believe the skulls should have been found, though.

    Anyway, that's my theory.


    I've looked at a gazillion websites concerning this case. If anyone can provide a link to the "unreleased" photos that would be great.
    Makes some sense. There is one problem. If Lisanne died that night, why was the phone accessed (no pin) days later, but no day time photos taken?

    If you like mysterious death stories, check out Colonel Shue.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Not here
    Posts
    8,703
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WillBrink View Post
    Panama uses the US dollar and Dutch money could simply be exchanged for US dollars. If someone looking to do bad things to them, and kill them, probably robbery as the motive. I assume plenty of killers don't rob their victims if robbery was not the motive. I don't find that telling at all in terms of accident vs foul play.
    A "prevailing" theory is that they saw someone or something that they shouldn't have seen in a remote part of the jungle and their bodies were chopped up and (in the case of Kris at least) decomposed with quicklime.

    https://bonesdontlie.wordpress.com/2...ogy-quicklime/


    I would think in that scenario the perps would have simply made the backpack and its contents disappear forever. It doesn't make sense to "plant it" for easy retrieval in the jungle, since evidently that renewed interest in the case.

    As for the deleted photo, I've read varying opinions on whether it could have been deleted and unrecoverable on the phone or if that would have required a computer. Some have stated that certain phone programs will thoroughly delete things so they are unrecoverable, too. I'm not a tech expert so I don't know. But the deleted photo on the phone is one of the things checked off in the "murder" column.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •