G&R Tactical
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Anyone have any experience with the m600df and the HL-x?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    32
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have both, they both work great. Bought the streamlight rechargeable battery for the hlx, cost $16. Buy whichever fits your budget.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NoVA/Richmond
    Posts
    6,216
    Feedback Score
    81 (100%)

    Anyone have any experience with the m600df and the HL-x?

    I was impressed with the brightness of the Streamlight for the price. Spill was very good but I didnít do much of a comparison between the two since I didnít like the form factor on it. Itís significantly bulkier than any of my Surefires and as mentioned, part of the pressure pad is significantly elevated and very sensitive. The gun I was mounting it on had limited options for placement and I had constant light NDs just playing with it in the house. The role of the gun it was on is a beater CQB gun, and I didnít need the light performance so I replaced it with a smaller M300/Malkoff that I had on hand. FWIW I have that M300, another M300, an M600U, and the M600DF as far as scout lights.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Sic semper tyrannis.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    2,882
    Feedback Score
    0
    I'd like to plug the new Malkoff E2HT head. Output isn't tremendous but the beam is tight. I can easily light up the mailboxes down the road about 100 yards away. If a person was there it would be pretty easy to identify who it is and what he's carrying, etc. Nice upgrade to an older scout for a bit north of $100.

    Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
    ďThe rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    375
    Feedback Score
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WS6 View Post
    I went with Modlite. I considered a DF head for it, but prefer the throw of the modlite head. Here is mine, targets at 100m, 3m apart.



    30 minute runtime, and my scale gets it at 3.6oz, but I trust Modlites published 4oz more.

    Here is the HLX, handheld, 1000L


    *My modlite is around 1250 lumens and uses a warm emitter. Their normal production ones will be 1500 and use a cooler emitter.
    Is the beam pictured the OKW?
    Theres not much difference in the SFDF and the the Modlight PLH except $350 vs $269 for the SFDF

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    690
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    I dont have experience with the HL-x but I have been using it's little brother the protac2 for almost 2 years now. I dont mind the tape switch like others are complaining about. Infact I usually prefer the switch mechanism in streamlites too surefires. When it comes to brand prefernces I have spent my own money and been issued surefire products in the past. Going forward I only plan on buying streamlites. I worked nights for years and saw dozens of dead surefires and surprisingly less dead streamlites. Insight is complete trash in my experience. My take away from my own expeiernce is that both brands will eventually fail, and light technology has such a rapid pace of development that it doesnt make sense to spend extra on surefire. I have an extremely aged surefire x300 and strealite 2 cell that both still work, but I wouldnt carry anymore because they simply under perform.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    513
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    I had a chance to compare an HLX side-by-side with my M600DF the other night. One distinct difference was the hotspot/throw between the two lights. I'm not sure of the specs on the Streamlight, but it appears to have quite a bit more candela than the Surefire. This typically isn't an issue for me on a normal night, as the Surefire still has plenty of throw for PID at 100 yards. The issue I found was with the amount of humidity we've had here in NE Oklahoma lately (record flooding in our area has made the humidity terrible). The Streamlight just seemed to "punch" through the thick air better than my Surefire. The humidity resembled smoke/fog when the light was activated, and the more focused throw of the Streamlight certainly had an advantage of the Surefire DF.

    I still like the Surefire DF and plan to keep using it on all of my non magnified rifles. I've found the beam pattern works well indoors, and is great for using the ambient light from the spill to light up hallways/rooms without directly aiming the weapon at what it is you want to put light on. I will say I think Surefire would be well served to release a version of the DF that has a more focused hotspot, as it certainly has it's advantages in certain situations.

    One thing of note; The Streamlight was a friends, and he informed me he has experienced issues with the light shutting off randomly during recoil. He ended up getting the tail cap replaced and it's not had issues since. My Surefire DF is running a tailcap only and has been 100%.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •